DID 9/11 RESEARCHER JIM HOFFMAN “ACCIDENTALLY” REVEAL THE WTC WAS NUKED?

Preface 
The Soviet "loose nukes" of the 1990's, the nuclear weapons cached inside the USA were used on 911. The presence of nuclear weapons on US soil was being investigated by the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM in the 1990's. To read the transcript of their meetings click on this link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-106hhrg66968/html/CHRG-106hhrg66968.htm 
The attacks of 911 were the Russian response to a plethora of terrorist outrages perpetrated by US/UK/NATO using Chechen proxies and mercenaries inside Russia during the decade 1991 to 2001. We know from the testimony of two high ranking Soviet defectors GRU Colonel Stanislav Lunev and KGB officer archivist Vasili Mitrokhin that Soviet weapons were smuggled into the United States. These weapons were used on 911. The examination of the dust cloud and the law of parsimony dictates that the simplest explanation is the preferred explanation. The energy requirements to destroy the buildings in the manner they were destroyed require nuclear weapons. Hence they were destroyed with nuclear weapons.   

On 13 June 2003 DOD employee Jim Hoffman published, "The North Tower's Dust Cloud: Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center," the first of a series of papers, an initial paper with three revisions including a fourth that has been pending since 2004, examining the thermodynamics by applying Boyle's Ideal Gas Law to the North Tower’s dust cloud to determine the energy requirements for its expansion. Hoffman determined that the energy requirements exceeded “the energy available in the form of the gravitational potential energy due to the tower's elevated mass.” 

With each revision, in order to save the controlled demolition hypothesis, Hoffman’s estimate for the amount of energy needed to produce the dust cloud was lowered. Although each revision was still well above “the energy available in the form of the gravitational potential energy due to the tower's elevated mass.” Hoffman’s estimates invalidated the controlled demolition hypothesis and necessitated the use of nuclear weapons to destroy the World Trade Center.

A comparison of the dust cloud of WTC-1 and the nuclear test NANCY. 

Enter Dr. John Kimber PhD. his critique of Hoffman's analysis revealed that the necessary explosives to create the dust cloud were in the kiloton range( .8 to 47 kilotons). Kimber curiously does not attack Hoffman's methodology, he just dismisses outright the notion that explosives were involved because of the quantity needed. The only other explanation is nuclear explosives were used to bring down the towers.

[Added 03 March 2023]
Concrete is a hydrate product. It is produced by hydration "a chemical reaction in which the major compounds in cement form chemical bonds with water molecules and become hydrates or hydration products.[3]" The extreme heat of the nuclear explosion flashed the water trapped in the concrete to steam causing the concrete to explode turning it to talcum powder fine mist and vaporized the steel skeleton of the buildings producing the dust cloud. The dust cloud consisted of concrete and steel. 

Anyone who has used a sledgehammer or a jackhammer knows from experience that concrete is very tough. It breaks apart in chunks. It does not flash to dust. It would take a very long time to pulverize every concrete floor of the WTC to dust using mechanical means like a jackhammer or sledgehammer. Yet, that is exactly what happened on 911. 

This video shows how much pressure it takes to break concrete bricks. The viewer will notice that the bricks break apart into chips not concrete dust. The buildings could not have been turned into dust via the mechanical pressure produced by gravity. 

Source:
1. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Twin Tower Collapses
Abstract, Revision History, and Acknowledgments for the Paper:
The North Tower's Dust Cloud:

2. Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center
http://911research.wtc7.net/papers/dustvolume/index.html

3. Scientific Principles
http://matse1.matse.illinois.edu/concrete/prin.html#:~:text=The%20water%20causes%20the%20hardening,become%20hydrates%20or%20hydration%20products.

4. Thompson, A. (2021, November 02). Watch concrete blow up when heated (and see why it happens). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a27377339/why-concrete-explodes/

Kimber's Critique:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/12/276245.shtml

http://the911debate.blogspot.com/2005/07/critique-of-jim-hoffmans-analyses-part.html