Chechnya is the covert war America lost. This is why it receives no press. 9-11 and the other Russian attacks on CONUS forced America to open the oil market to Russia and to raise the price of oil. The Russians had to be paid off and they were with the precipitous rise in oil prices. Prior to this America was trying to turn Russia into a Third World Country, using the IMF in order to leverage Russia into doing what they wanted economically. They thought that they could push Russia around in the same way they did every other country on Earth. It didn't work. They failed to catch Russia in their Military and Economic pincers. The ARC thought they could balkanize the Russian Federation by backing the Islamo-Nazi Chechens, infiltrating U.S. Special Forces and Afghan-Arab veterans of the Afghan War into Chechnya to fight an unconventional war. That scheme failed.
9-11 was an embarrassment for the American Ruling Class (ARC). The WTC housed the offices of several federal agencies. The Secret Service and the CIA had offices in the complex. They utterly failed to stop the attacks on their own offices in the World Trade Center for a second time. At 10:28:23 am both towers had been destroyed, this was the same time to the second the Kursk was torpedoed off the coast of Murmansk sending her to the bottom. The Russians were clearly sending a message. Vladimir Putin was the first foreign leader to talk to George Bush the day of the attacks. The Russians stopped the jamming of Air Force One's communication system in order for the call to be made. Putin strong armed his way into the oil markets. The Russians really had not got even their foot into the door before 911. Russian oil on the market is a threat to the petrodollar. Putin must have given George W. Bush an offer he could not refuse on 911. The Russians were conducting a nuclear exercise the day of 911. The Communications Jamming of the American Government had effectively decapitated not only the President but the line of succession. If Russia had decided to turn their exercise into a real attack, America's ability to conduct an immediate response would have been compromised. Any response that could have been mustered would have been very uncoordinated.
The 9-11 attacks took place in parallel to the raising of the Kursk. Which was destroyed by the United States Navy. Two Los Angeles class submarines the Memphis and Toledo were tailing the Kursk when it sank. One of them fired a Mark-48 torpedo at the Kursk sending it to the bottom. The 9-11 attacks were retaliation in part for this humiliation. The 9-11 attacks also took the attention of the news media away from raising of the Kursk.
 |
| The planes were electronically "hijacked." This was covered up in order protect the airline industry. Because who would want to get on a plane, if they knew the plane could be hijacked again? Ask a pilot, or if you can ask a naval aviator, "how hard it would be to put the nose of an airliner going 530 mph or more into a window.?" It is hard to land a plane on an aircraft carrier going 150 mph. Flight 77 was travelling 3.5 times that speed. Hani Hanjour was an incompetent pilot who had never flown a 757. [Note 1] |
The Russians clearly wanted revenge for the attack on the Kursk. Which is why they targeted the US Navy Command Center at the Pentagon. 125 Americans were killed at the Pentagon and 118 Russians were killed in the Kursk. The numbers are nearly identical. The 9-11 "truthers" rarely, if ever, mention the destruction of the Navy Command Center. They concentrate on "what" hit the Pentagon. Some say a cruise missile. No, it was a plane. The whole missile thing is just more misdirection. If you have people believing there is a mystery about what hit the Pentagon, they are diverted from asking the hard questions. Such as, Who would know where the Navy Command Center is? Does Bin Laden really have the espionage capability to know these things? Why would he target the Navy? Why did a nearly identical number of Americans die at the Pentagon as Russians died on the Kursk? Once these questions are asked. Then the explanation that this was "Al Qaeda" is seen for the farce that it is. Only a nation state would have had the espionage capability to find out where the navy command center was and target it. In fact once any thought is given to the logistics of the attack, one can only conclude that there was nation state involvement.
Most embarrassingly they could not prevent the attack on their own Pentagon, the most secure building on the planet. The WTC and the Pentagon are the symbolic face of the two pincers the ARC has used to control much of the planet namely money (economic force) and military force. The fact that the attackers got past this security shows there was nation state sponsorship. That nation was Russia. They had an axe to grind and they used that axe to knock down the World Trade Center. The American Military had been conducting an terrorist war inside Russia that killed tens of thousands of Russian citizens and only a year prior to this Bill Clinton ordered two American submarines to destroy Russia's Kursk submarine. Clinton wanted to embarrass the Russians in front of the Chinese and did so.
The majority of 9-11 truthers have been misdirected to believe that it was an "inside job." This thesis presupposes nation state sponsorship by the United States government and anyone who researches the 9-11 attacks will conclude that their sophistication requires state sponsorship. The ARC knows this so they have led a misdirection campaign to make people believe that it was an "inside job." Propagating this belief is also self serving because it projects an air of omnipotence around the American Ruling Class. They have everything under control. And on some level that is reassuring to the American people. The thought that there could be an outside threat is more disconcerting. An "inside job" is highly unlikely. President Bush's reaction to the news of the attacks is evidence enough that the attacks were not sponsored by him or his administration. Only one of the world's greatest actors could have feigned that reaction.
This graph shows that Russian economy begins to improve in 1998 when Putin becomes director of the FSB. The ascent of the Russian economy rises with the Putin's climb to the heights of the Russian government. The 911 attacks showed the American Ruling Class that the Russians meant business. They were not going down without a fight. Of course no one would call George W. Bush an appeaser for giving into the Russians, the majority of Americans still have no idea that Russia attacked on 911. He had no real choice other than to appease. The American Ruling Class had to let their oil onto the market. Bush had been bested on 911; less than a year before that he was campaigning on a get tough with Russia platform. The American Ruling Class was relying too heavily on their SDI system. America had long been sold on Nazi scientist Werner Von Braun's pipe dream that you could control the Earth by controling the space around it. That system was in place by the late 1960's. The Russians countered it with "suitcase" nukes. It's impossible to stop a nuke the size of a coke can. The whole SDI system was rendered useless and the Russians demonstrated that uselessness in spades on 911. It reminds me of the story of how NASA spent millions of dollars to develop a ballpoint pen that would work in microgravity. The Russians just decided to use a pencil.
It is notable that the price of crude oil plummets in 2008-2009 parallelling the American defeat in Chechnya. The economy is really a shadow of realpolitik. The failure of America to bust Chechnya out of the Russian Federation caused the economic collapse of 2009. America failed to spread its empire. There will be no expansion of the American economic system into Russia. There will be no expansion of the American dominated capitalist system. This is what really caused the economy to collapse in 2009.
Sources/Notes:
1.
"I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon," the former employee said. "He could not fly at all."
A Trainee Noted for Incompetence
May 4, 2002
By JIM YARDLEY
Although the authorities say none of the 19 hijackers on Sept. 11 were tied to an F.B.I. intelligence alert issued by an agent in Arizona two months earlier, one hijacker, Hani Hanjour, had come to the Federal Aviation Administration's attention earlier last year, when he trained in Phoenix.
Mr. Hanjour, who investigators contend piloted the airliner that crashed into the Pentagon, was reported to the aviation agency in February 2001 after instructors at his flight school in Phoenix had found his piloting skills so shoddy and his grasp of English so inadequate that they questioned whether his pilot's license was genuine.
Records show a Hani Hanjour obtained a license in 1999 in Scottsdale, Ariz. Previous and sometimes contradictory reports said he failed in 1996 and 1997 to obtain a license at other schools.
"The staff thought he was a very nice guy, but they didn't think his English was up to level," said Marilyn Ladner, a vice president at the Pan Am International Flight Academy, which operated the center in Phoenix. Ms. Ladner said that the F.A.A. examined Mr. Hanjour's credentials and found them legitimate and that an inspector, by coincidence, attended a class with Mr. Hanjour. The inspector also offered to find an interpreter to help Mr. Hanjour, she said.
"He ended up observing Hani in class," Ms. Ladner added, "though that was not his original reason for being there."
Company officials briefed members of Congress about the case, including Representative James L. Oberstar, Democrat of Minnesota, who made public some of its general details in December.
The aviation agency did not return a call for comment.
Pan Am International, one of the largest pilot schools in the nation, also operated the flight school in Eagan, Minn., near Minneapolis, where the instructors' suspicions led to the arrest of Zacarias Moussaoui, the man whom the authorities have said was intended to be the 20th hijacker.
Ms. Ladner said the Phoenix staff never suspected that Mr. Hanjour was a hijacker but feared that his skills were so weak that he could pose a safety hazard if he flew a commercial airliner.
"There was no suspicion as far as evildoing," Ms. Ladner said. "It was more of a very typical instructional concern that 'you really shouldn't be in the air.'"
A former employee of the school said that the staff initially made good-faith efforts to help Mr. Hanjour and that he received individual instruction for a few days. But he was a poor student. On one written problem that usually takes 20 minutes to complete, Mr. Hanjour took three hours, the former employee said, and he answered incorrectly.
Ultimately, administrators at the school told Mr. Hanjour that he would not qualify for the advanced certificate. But the ex-employee said Mr. Hanjour continued to pay to train on a simulator for Boeing 737 jets. "He didn't care about the fact that he couldn't get through the course," the ex-employee said.
Staff members characterized Mr. Hanjour as polite, meek and very quiet. But most of all, the former employee said, they considered him a very bad pilot.
"I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon," the former employee said. "He could not fly at all." (nytimes)
No comments:
Post a Comment