Friday 19 April 2019
THE BRANCH DAVIDIANS WERE SACRIFICED TO KEEP CHECHNYA OUT OF THE NEWS
Thursday 11 April 2019
BIN LADEN & THE CIA'S MIGHTY WURLITZER
So, why frame Bin Laden? Why use him to cover up Russian retaliatory strikes? The framing of Osama Bin Laden was an American intervention in Saudi politics in support of the Saudi royal family and more importantly it distanced the American Ruling Class from the spook operations they were running in Chechnya using Saudis like Bin Laden. It gave the ARC cover or at least they thought it did. The Bin Laden family is (or was) the second most powerful family in Saudi Arabia. Only the royal family is more powerful. The Bin Laden family is a potential threat to the Saudi royals. The framing of Bin Laden tarnished the name of the whole Bin Laden family. This puts the whole family on their heels. It keeps them under control. It makes it to where the whole family can be viewed with suspicion and monitored. The CIA used their Wurlitzer, i.e. control of world media, to make the Bin Laden name synonymous with evil and it worked. The whole world has been brainwashed to believe he committed crimes he had no hand in committing. More recently more tragedy has befallen the family the three most powerful Bin Laden's were forced to turn over their property to the state (Paul et al.). The true power behind the throne is still the CIA.
Sources:
Paul, Katie et al. "As A Saudi Prince Rose, The Bin Laden Business Empire Crumbled". Reuters, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/saudi-binladin-fall/.
Tuesday 9 April 2019
DID 9/11 RESEARCHER JIM HOFFMAN “ACCIDENTALLY” REVEAL THE WTC WAS NUKED?
Preface
The Soviet "loose nukes" of the 1990's, the nuclear weapons cached inside the USA were used on 911. The presence of nuclear weapons on US soil was being investigated by the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM in the 1990's. To read the transcript of their meetings click on this link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-106hhrg66968/html/CHRG-106hhrg66968.htm
The attacks of 911 were the Russian response to a plethora of terrorist outrages perpetrated by US/UK/NATO using Chechen proxies and mercenaries inside Russia during the decade 1991 to 2001. We know from the testimony of two high ranking Soviet defectors GRU Colonel Stanislav Lunev and KGB officer archivist Vasili Mitrokhin that Soviet weapons were smuggled into the United States. These weapons were used on 911. The examination of the dust cloud and the law of parsimony dictates that the simplest explanation is the preferred explanation. The energy requirements to destroy the buildings in the manner they were destroyed require nuclear weapons. Hence they were destroyed with nuclear weapons.
On 13 June 2003 DOD employee Jim Hoffman published, "The North Tower's Dust Cloud: Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center," the first of a series of papers, an initial paper with three revisions including a fourth that has been pending since 2004, examining the thermodynamics by applying Boyle's Ideal Gas Law to the North Tower’s dust cloud to determine the energy requirements for its expansion. Hoffman determined that the energy requirements exceeded “the energy available in the form of the gravitational potential energy due to the tower's elevated mass.”
With each revision, in order to save the controlled demolition hypothesis, Hoffman’s estimate for the amount of energy needed to produce the dust cloud was lowered. Although each revision was still well above “the energy available in the form of the gravitational potential energy due to the tower's elevated mass.” Hoffman’s estimates invalidated the controlled demolition hypothesis and necessitated the use of nuclear weapons to destroy the World Trade Center.
The Soviet "loose nukes" of the 1990's, the nuclear weapons cached inside the USA were used on 911. The presence of nuclear weapons on US soil was being investigated by the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM in the 1990's. To read the transcript of their meetings click on this link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-106hhrg66968/html/CHRG-106hhrg66968.htm
The attacks of 911 were the Russian response to a plethora of terrorist outrages perpetrated by US/UK/NATO using Chechen proxies and mercenaries inside Russia during the decade 1991 to 2001. We know from the testimony of two high ranking Soviet defectors GRU Colonel Stanislav Lunev and KGB officer archivist Vasili Mitrokhin that Soviet weapons were smuggled into the United States. These weapons were used on 911. The examination of the dust cloud and the law of parsimony dictates that the simplest explanation is the preferred explanation. The energy requirements to destroy the buildings in the manner they were destroyed require nuclear weapons. Hence they were destroyed with nuclear weapons.
On 13 June 2003 DOD employee Jim Hoffman published, "The North Tower's Dust Cloud: Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center," the first of a series of papers, an initial paper with three revisions including a fourth that has been pending since 2004, examining the thermodynamics by applying Boyle's Ideal Gas Law to the North Tower’s dust cloud to determine the energy requirements for its expansion. Hoffman determined that the energy requirements exceeded “the energy available in the form of the gravitational potential energy due to the tower's elevated mass.”
With each revision, in order to save the controlled demolition hypothesis, Hoffman’s estimate for the amount of energy needed to produce the dust cloud was lowered. Although each revision was still well above “the energy available in the form of the gravitational potential energy due to the tower's elevated mass.” Hoffman’s estimates invalidated the controlled demolition hypothesis and necessitated the use of nuclear weapons to destroy the World Trade Center.
 |
| A comparison of the dust cloud of WTC-1 and the nuclear test NANCY. |
Enter Dr. John Kimber PhD. his critique of Hoffman's analysis revealed that the necessary explosives to create the dust cloud were in the kiloton range( .8 to 47 kilotons). Kimber curiously does not attack Hoffman's methodology, he just dismisses outright the notion that explosives were involved because of the quantity needed. The only other explanation is nuclear explosives were used to bring down the towers.
[Added 03 March 2023]
Concrete is a hydrate product. It is produced by hydration "a chemical reaction in which the major compounds in cement form chemical bonds with water molecules and become hydrates or hydration products.[3]" The extreme heat of the nuclear explosion flashed the water trapped in the concrete to steam causing the concrete to explode turning it to talcum powder fine mist and vaporized the steel skeleton of the buildings producing the dust cloud. The dust cloud consisted of concrete and steel.
[Added 03 March 2023]
Concrete is a hydrate product. It is produced by hydration "a chemical reaction in which the major compounds in cement form chemical bonds with water molecules and become hydrates or hydration products.[3]" The extreme heat of the nuclear explosion flashed the water trapped in the concrete to steam causing the concrete to explode turning it to talcum powder fine mist and vaporized the steel skeleton of the buildings producing the dust cloud. The dust cloud consisted of concrete and steel.
Anyone who has used a sledgehammer or a jackhammer knows from experience that concrete is very tough. It breaks apart in chunks. It does not flash to dust. It would take a very long time to pulverize every concrete floor of the WTC to dust using mechanical means like a jackhammer or sledgehammer. Yet, that is exactly what happened on 911.
Source:
1. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Twin Tower Collapses
Abstract, Revision History, and Acknowledgments for the Paper:
The North Tower's Dust Cloud:
2. Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center
http://911research.wtc7.net/papers/dustvolume/index.html
3. Scientific Principles
http://matse1.matse.illinois.edu/concrete/prin.html#:~:text=The%20water%20causes%20the%20hardening,become%20hydrates%20or%20hydration%20products.
4. Thompson, A. (2021, November 02). Watch concrete blow up when heated (and see why it happens). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a27377339/why-concrete-explodes/
Kimber's Critique:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/12/276245.shtml
http://the911debate.blogspot.com/2005/07/critique-of-jim-hoffmans-analyses-part.html
This video shows how much pressure it takes to break concrete bricks. The viewer will notice that the bricks break apart into chips not concrete dust. The buildings could not have been turned into dust via the mechanical pressure produced by gravity.
Source:
1. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Twin Tower Collapses
Abstract, Revision History, and Acknowledgments for the Paper:
The North Tower's Dust Cloud:
2. Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the Dust Cloud Following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center
http://911research.wtc7.net/papers/dustvolume/index.html
3. Scientific Principles
http://matse1.matse.illinois.edu/concrete/prin.html#:~:text=The%20water%20causes%20the%20hardening,become%20hydrates%20or%20hydration%20products.
4. Thompson, A. (2021, November 02). Watch concrete blow up when heated (and see why it happens). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a27377339/why-concrete-explodes/
Kimber's Critique:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/12/276245.shtml
http://the911debate.blogspot.com/2005/07/critique-of-jim-hoffmans-analyses-part.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)