The purpose of this blog is to document America's nuclear aero-space program being run out of AREA-51 using open sources. It has been said that 90% of intelligence analysis uses open sources. The preponderance of the evidence shows that the American Military runs part of their Black Space Program out of AREA-51 utilizing nuclear powered propulsion.
Friday, 26 October 2018
Sunday, 21 October 2018
The 911 attacks were designed to minimize casualties at the WTC and specifically targeted offices at the Pentagon.
WTC
The number of casualties on 911 was extremely low. 2,996 people died. This is an incredibly low number considering what could have been. If the Russians had planned their attack for noon, they would have maximized their causalities. 50,000 people worked at the WTC and 200,000 people visited daily. Out of that quarter of a million people only 2,606 people died at the WTC. That’s only a little over 1%. Out of the number of 50,000 workers, only 5% of the people were killed. Therefore the attackers aimed to decrease the provocation by keeping the casualties low.
How they did it.
Beginning the attacks before the end of rush hour was essential. At 0846 hours the first plane hits the North Tower of the WTC. NYC’s rush hour runs from 7am to 10am. The morning rush was a little over halfway done and New Yorkers normally start their day later than most cities. Their median arrival time is 0824 hours (Silver 2018). So, 0846 hours was chosen in order to minimize the casualties. The attackers also decided to place their first hit on higher floors than the second hit. Flight 11 struck floors 93-99 of the North Tower leaving 89% of the floors beneath intact. Flight 175 struck lower down on the South Tower hitting floors 75-85 leaving 72% of the floors intact. The timing of the attacks also meant that people going to work decided not to go to their office.
The Pentagon
The Offices of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Naval Operations Center (DIA & NOC) were targeted that day. A sure sign of Russian revenge for the sinking of the Kursk. The attacks on the DIA & NOC were intentional. The offices were located inside an inner ring of the first floor of the Pentagon. These were precision attacks and could only have been conducted by an autopilot. In the 1990’s Russian intelligence had penetrated Honeywell, the manufacturer of the avionics used in 757-767 airliners. They were in a position to hack the auto pilots.
Sources:
History TV. (2018). History TV. [online] Available at: https://www.history.com/topics/world-trade-center [Accessed 18 Jun. 2018].
Plumer, B. (2013). Nine facts about terrorism in the United States since 9/11. The Washington Post. [online] Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/11/nine-facts-about-terrorism-in-the-united-states-since-911/?utm_term [Accessed 18 Jun. 2018].
Silver, N. (2018). Which Cities Sleep In, And Which Get To Work Early. [online] FiveThirtyEight. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-cities-sleep-in-and-which-get-to-work-early/ [Accessed 18 Jun. 2018].
NOTE: 12 September 2019
The timing of the strikes indicates that the planes were electronically hijacked.
Note 05 November 2019
The biggest clue that the attack was designed to minimize casualties is that they did not set the bombs off until after the people were evacuated from the buildings.
The number of casualties on 911 was extremely low. 2,996 people died. This is an incredibly low number considering what could have been. If the Russians had planned their attack for noon, they would have maximized their causalities. 50,000 people worked at the WTC and 200,000 people visited daily. Out of that quarter of a million people only 2,606 people died at the WTC. That’s only a little over 1%. Out of the number of 50,000 workers, only 5% of the people were killed. Therefore the attackers aimed to decrease the provocation by keeping the casualties low.
How they did it.
Beginning the attacks before the end of rush hour was essential. At 0846 hours the first plane hits the North Tower of the WTC. NYC’s rush hour runs from 7am to 10am. The morning rush was a little over halfway done and New Yorkers normally start their day later than most cities. Their median arrival time is 0824 hours (Silver 2018). So, 0846 hours was chosen in order to minimize the casualties. The attackers also decided to place their first hit on higher floors than the second hit. Flight 11 struck floors 93-99 of the North Tower leaving 89% of the floors beneath intact. Flight 175 struck lower down on the South Tower hitting floors 75-85 leaving 72% of the floors intact. The timing of the attacks also meant that people going to work decided not to go to their office.
The Pentagon
The Offices of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Naval Operations Center (DIA & NOC) were targeted that day. A sure sign of Russian revenge for the sinking of the Kursk. The attacks on the DIA & NOC were intentional. The offices were located inside an inner ring of the first floor of the Pentagon. These were precision attacks and could only have been conducted by an autopilot. In the 1990’s Russian intelligence had penetrated Honeywell, the manufacturer of the avionics used in 757-767 airliners. They were in a position to hack the auto pilots.
Sources:
History TV. (2018). History TV. [online] Available at: https://www.history.com/topics/world-trade-center [Accessed 18 Jun. 2018].
Plumer, B. (2013). Nine facts about terrorism in the United States since 9/11. The Washington Post. [online] Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/11/nine-facts-about-terrorism-in-the-united-states-since-911/?utm_term [Accessed 18 Jun. 2018].
Silver, N. (2018). Which Cities Sleep In, And Which Get To Work Early. [online] FiveThirtyEight. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-cities-sleep-in-and-which-get-to-work-early/ [Accessed 18 Jun. 2018].
NOTE: 12 September 2019
The timing of the strikes indicates that the planes were electronically hijacked.
Note 05 November 2019
The biggest clue that the attack was designed to minimize casualties is that they did not set the bombs off until after the people were evacuated from the buildings.
Sunday, 14 October 2018
Bissell, Richard M et al. Reflections Of A Cold Warrior. Yale University Press, 1996
Richard Bissell’s memoirs show some interesting things about the U-2 program. The first thing they show is that the intended goal of the program was psychological warfare to deter the Soviet’s from going to war with the United States. The second thing they show is that these were suicide missions for the pilots. If the pilots were to go off course, the planes were rigged to explode killing the pilot and destroying the U-2 (Wise). The early U-2's did not have ejection seats. This is despite the fact that engineers had known since WW2 that because of their high-speed jets required ejection seats to insure pilot survival.The U-2 Powers was in supposedly had an ejector seat but he did not trust it. Because the seats were rigged to destroy the plane and the pilot (Wise 10). It is not known how much time Powers had to escape from the plane because the timer to the bomb was never found. If Powers had pulled the cord he probably would have died. In fact Bissell was surprised to find that Powers survived. He had been told it was impossible for the pilot to survive. The pilots that overfly Russia today probably face the same dilemma.
Two years later Gary Powers would be shot down or more likely, after the nuclear engine had been removed, was crash landed in the Soviet Union. I say this because the cover-story that was concocted does not make sense. It’s impossible that Powers could have escaped without an ejection seat. The story that runs along the lines told by L. Fletcher Prouty is more aligned with the truth on this when thinking logically. Prouty did omit the significant fact that the planes were nuclear powered. He kind of alluded to it, claiming that the planes were powered by hydrogen and the tanks had been removed. The U-2, according to Prouty, had a hydrogen tank the size of a fire-extinguisher. This was more of a half-truth. The U-2’s were powered by a small nuclear reactor roughly the size of an extinguisher cooled by lithium hydride which also served as a shadow shield.
Bissell’s claim that a pilot serendipitously discovered Baikonur Cosmodrome is a lie. ???
Lastly - the quote from page 113 reveals that the Soviets and the American’s cooperated to keep the overflights secret. Similarly, today the Russians and the American’s cooperate to keep secret the Russian terror attacks of the 1990’s on American overseas assets and the continental United States i.e. the first WTC bombing of 1993, the Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995 and 911.
Bissell, Richard M et al. Reflections Of A Cold Warrior. Yale University Press, 1996
Page-113
“It is my belief that the Soviets always made their protests privately because they did not want to admit to their citizens that the United States could overfly them with impunity and that the government was powerless to do anything about it. This tactic suited us very well, as we did not want public exposure to produce an ultimatum for the Soviets that the world press would convert into a cause for war. What actually happened was that the two governments, even in their deep hostility, found it convenient to collaborate and keep the flights secret.”
Bissell also claims that the Soviets misidentified the U-2 for a twin-engine bomber i.e the Canberra. The CIA report on the U-2 from the early 1990’s revealed that Canberra’s were used with the U-2 on some missions (Pedlow and Welzenbach 109).
Page – 119
“On most missions pilots had virtually no freedom to deviate from their assigned course unless they had compelling reason. We were concerned that the burning more fuel than necessary might jeopardize the pilot’s life and mission.”
Bissell goes on to claim that Baikonur Cosmodrome was accidently discovered by a U-2 pilot in June of 1957.
The nuclear plane was going to operate at 70,000 feet.
Page-123
“We were equally aware that a Soviet modified surface-to-air missile had an estimated altitude capability of at least 70,000 feet, which was very close to the altitude of the U-2.”
Page-125
“A big tractor-trailer could, as Art Lundahl says, “pull up on any highway, erect the back end, and fire an ICBM.” If, however, the operation was tied to railroad spurs, which required a lot of iron and scouring up of the countryside, it was easier to locate where the firing was going to come from before it occurred. Although, a rail served system seemed to the experts all but certain, the system’s degree of fulfillment still needed to be known.”
Page – 129
“He finally managed to eject himself, but in the tussle and wrestle of doing so, he was unable to activate the destruct mechanism.”
Page – 140
“I believe this strongly, and it’s a point that has never been made about the history of the U-2. The U-2 was a deterrent because it showed that the United States possessed a significant technological capability that the Soviets could not match. That was a great accomplishment.”
Other Sources and Notes:
Wise, David. "FRANCIS GARY POWERS IS ALIVE AND LIVING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA". The Los Angeles Times Magazine, 1968, pp. 11-13.
“The highest altitude at which a Martin-Baker seat was deployed was 57,000 ft (17,400 m) (from a Canberra bomber in 1958).”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejection_seat
http://eastafricaschoolserver.org/Wikipedia/wp/l/Lithium_hydride.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82nCRWawfhQ&t=329s
The lithium-hydride shadow shield for the SNAP-8. The shield were relatively light weight. This shield weighed around 500 to 600 pounds about half the weight of a similar volume of water. The diameter of the J-57 is 39 inches. The shadow shield of the SNAP-8 is the same diameter.
![]() |
| Shadow Shield |
![]() |
| SNAP-8 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_J57
Thursday, 30 August 2018
Sunday, 19 August 2018
ATTACK ON COLE TURNED TERRORIST BOAT TO 'CONFETTI' EXPLOSION RAISES CONCERNS ABOUT YEMEN SECURITY, OFFICIALS SAY; UNDERWATER SEARCH FOR 10 SAILORS CONTINUES
The Augusta Chronicle (Georgia)
October 16, 2000, Monday,, FINAL EDITION
A blast more powerful ''than just TNT'' buckled the USS
Cole's deck and turned the attacking boat into ''confetti size'' pieces that
rained down on the crippled destroyer, officials said Sunday in accounts that
shed light on the enormous devastation of the bombing. The details, provided by
senior U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity, also raised
questions about the level of security in a port selected last year as a key
refueling point for U.S. warships traveling between the Mediterranean and the
Persian Gulf.
There has been no credible claim of responsibility from
Thursday's apparent suicide attack, which killed 17 sailors, wounded 39 others
and punched a 40-by-40-foot chasm in the hull. Yemeni security forces have
detained more than a dozen people for further questioning, but no arrests have
been announced. It ranks as the deadliest terrorist attack on the U.S. military
since the bombing of an Air Force barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 that killed
19.
''Now exactly who was behind it, what their motivation was
and how they were able to arrange it, that we can't speculate on,'' said
Barbara Bodine, the U.S. ambassador to Yemen. ''The ship has suffered a
tremendous blow,'' said Rear Adm. Mark Fitzgerald, the military commander of
the U.S. task force sent to the ship. On the listing deck of the Cole, crew
members gathered for religious services and offered prayers for their dead
shipmates - some still wedged behind contorted metal below. A planned formal
memorial was delayed because the crew worked through the night to control
flooding after another bulk head collapsed, officials said.
Also on Sunday, the plane carrying 33 injured crew members
landed at the Norfolk Naval Station in Norfolk, Va., while the other six
injured remained hospitalized in Germany. The bodies of five of the sailors
killed arrived back on U.S. soil Saturday. Meanwhile, experts began scouring
the ravaged ship in search of clues and the bodies of sailors still missing. Divers
began searching water-filled compartments. Crews with powerful metal cutters
will try to slice through the wreckage to reach bodies: two visible and 10
still missing and perhaps trapped behind floors and walls bent wildly by the
blast.
Terrorism and explosive experts combed through scenes
described by a U.S. official as ''utter devastation.'' On the deck, ''confetti
size'' pieces from the wooden attack boat were collected, the official said. Among
the tasks for the investigators: looking for residue that could indicate the
type of explosives. One of the officials said the power of the blast suggested
''more than just TNT'' - which could suggest a well-organized and supplied
group.
The officials said the blast occurred shortly after the ship
was secured to two buoys to begin refueling in the harbor, which was full of
pleasure boats, fishing vessels and merchant ships. About two to three support
vessels were around the Cole, including pilot craft and a garbage barge. There
was no cry of alarm from the Cole's crew. Two people on the attack boat
reportedly stood at attention briefly before the explosion.
The blast at the waterline was close to the dining area for
senior enlisted officers. Most hands were busy finishing the docking. A few
minutes later, however, and the mess area would have started to fill. Immediately
after the explosion, the ship began to fill with oily water from the 40-foot
deep harbor. The ship listed under the weight of the flood. The impact wrenched
open hatches and buckled parts of the deck on the 4-year-old destroyer, whose
modern construction may have helped it stay afloat. Power was lost, and
generators were used to pump out water and keep the Cole afloat.
The U.S. Navy has ''blanket clearance'' to dock at Aden,
where it keeps its own stockpile of fuel in cooperation with a private Yemeni
company. Normally, a 48-hour advance notice is given of a ship's arrival. The
information is passed on to Yemeni port authorities and the fuel agent, officials
said. U.S. diplomats have insisted the Yemeni government is not suspected of
any terrorists links. But security has been a key issue regarding Aden, the
home base for an Islamic militant group founded by the brother of terrorist
mastermind Osama bin Laden. Mr. bin Laden has been accused of links to the 1998
bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people.
HOLLOWAY'S COMMENTARY
The mystery of what hit the USS Cole on 12 October 2000 has never been solved. The power of the blast though suggests that the Cole was hit with a tactical nuclear weapon. The attack was retaliation for the sinking of the Kursk that had occurred on the 12th of August just two months prior. The odds of two significant naval attacks occurring on the 12th of the month in a year are 925 to 1. So, the odds that this was a coincidence are very long indeed.
The attackers according the article only may have had a 48 hour window to launch the attack. This shows that the attackers were very sophisticated. The attack was too sophisticated for Bin Laden. Yemen during the Cold War was divided along ideological lines. North Yemen was supported by the Soviets. The Russian's had intelligence assets in the country. The attack was revenge for America's sinking of the Kursk.
The attack on the USS COLE could have been prevented, if the ship had been nuclear powered, then there would have been no need to refuel in the port at Aden. The United States Navy is beholden to BIG OIL. The Navy consumes large amounts of petroleum to power it's surface fleet [1]. An oil fueled fleet might be good for America's oil companies. But, on October 12, 2000 it caused the deaths of 17 sailors. Greed is more important than the safety of America's sailors. 17 sailors had to die, so fat cat Americans could make a buck off an antiquated technology known as OIL.
13 September 2019
The fact that the USN had "blanket clearance", meaning they can just enter the port of Aden whenever they want no prior warning given, shows that the level of sophistication needed to carry out the attack was beyond Bin Laden's capability. The attackers needed surveillance to carry out the attack. Only the Russians would have both the motive and capability to carry out this attack.
1. The USN spent 4 to 5 billion dollars a year on fuel in 2013.
SOURCE:
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/02/us-navy-spends-4-billion-fuel-every-year/
The attackers according the article only may have had a 48 hour window to launch the attack. This shows that the attackers were very sophisticated. The attack was too sophisticated for Bin Laden. Yemen during the Cold War was divided along ideological lines. North Yemen was supported by the Soviets. The Russian's had intelligence assets in the country. The attack was revenge for America's sinking of the Kursk.
The attack on the USS COLE could have been prevented, if the ship had been nuclear powered, then there would have been no need to refuel in the port at Aden. The United States Navy is beholden to BIG OIL. The Navy consumes large amounts of petroleum to power it's surface fleet [1]. An oil fueled fleet might be good for America's oil companies. But, on October 12, 2000 it caused the deaths of 17 sailors. Greed is more important than the safety of America's sailors. 17 sailors had to die, so fat cat Americans could make a buck off an antiquated technology known as OIL.
13 September 2019
The fact that the USN had "blanket clearance", meaning they can just enter the port of Aden whenever they want no prior warning given, shows that the level of sophistication needed to carry out the attack was beyond Bin Laden's capability. The attackers needed surveillance to carry out the attack. Only the Russians would have both the motive and capability to carry out this attack.
1. The USN spent 4 to 5 billion dollars a year on fuel in 2013.
SOURCE:
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/02/us-navy-spends-4-billion-fuel-every-year/
Saturday, 18 August 2018
RED MERCURY WTC-93, OKC-95 & 9-11
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14619750-300-cherry-red-and-very-dangerous/
THIS WEEK 29 April 1995
Cherry red and very dangerous
By Rob Edwards
“RED MERCURY”, a uniquely powerful chemical explosive which has been dismissed by many experts as a myth, could be real, and it could pose a serious threat to the world’s attempts to control the spread of nuclear weapons. New information leaked from South Africa, Russia and the US has convinced leading nuclear weapons scientists that the chemical’s potential risks should now be taken seriously.
The scientists, who include Sam Cohen, the American nuclear physicist who invented the neutron bomb, and Frank Barnaby, the former director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, are worried that red mercury could make it much easier for nations or terrorist groups to construct small but deadly thermonuclear fusion weapons. They are calling for the 178-nation conference on the future of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, due to end in New York in two weeks, to introduce tougher controls on the international trade in tritium, one of the raw materials of the fusion bomb.
“I don’t want to sound melodramatic,” says Cohen, who worked on the Manhattan Project to build the atom bomb in the 1940s and was a nuclear weapons adviser to the US government with the Rand Corporation for 20 years. “But red mercury is real and it is terrifying. I think it is part of a terrorist weapon that potentially spells the end of organised society.” He claims that it could be used to make a baseball-sized neutron bomb capable of killing everyone within about 600 metres of the explosion.
Barnaby, a respected nuclear weapons analyst who has been investigating red mercury for the past six years, is more cautious. He accepts that there have been many cases in which offers of red mercury for sale at enormous prices have turned out to be hoaxes. But he believes “on the balance of probabilities” that a mercury-based high explosive which could revolutionise the design of nuclear weapons was developed within the former Soviet Union.
The latest evidence Barnaby has seen is two documents leaked to Greenpeace, apparently from a former mercury production plant in South Africa. The documents detail chemical specifications for a substance called “red mercury 20:20”; a compound of pure mercury and mercury antimony oxide (Hg2Sb2O7) described as “cherry red” and “semi-liquid”. The documents seem to form part of a request from an unknown buyer for the supply of “4-10 flasks per month” of the substance.
One of the documents, dated 2 April 1990, is addressed to Wolfgang Dolich at the British-owned Thor Chemical company at Speyer, near Mannheim in Germany. Dolich, who was a sales manager at the time and is now the company’s German director, could not remember who had sent him the document, nor could he decipher whose illegible signature it bears. But he thinks the document is likely to be one of the many requests that he used to receive for mercury products. He says that he probably passed it on to his company’s sister plant at Cato Ridge in Natal, South Africa, where mercury compounds were manufactured until a few years ago.
But Dolich told New Scientist that nothing could have come of the request because Thor, which runs chemicals businesses in seven countries from its headquarters in Margate, Kent, had never been involved in the manufacture of red mercury.
The document also contains a handwritten note saying “Herewith all we have on red mercury” and signed “Alan”. Dolich thinks this is likely to be Alan Kidger, Thor’s Johannesburg-based sales director who was mysteriously murdered in November 1991. South African police investigators believe that Kidger’s murder could be linked to a clandestine trade in red mercury, although the company denies this.
Barnaby regards the specifications in the documents as scientifically credible, although they are not always easy to understand. They are similar to others he has seen from Russia, Germany and Austria and reinforce his view that there is a significant international trade in red mercury. In association with two other senior scientists from Italy and the US, whom he declined to name, he is now actively trying to acquire a small sample of red mercury so that its alleged properties can be properly tested in a laboratory.
Barnaby’s group has talked to four unnamed scientists in Russia. Barnaby says all four provided detailed information about red mercury. As a result Barnaby has concluded that it is a polymer with a gel-like consistency in which mercury and antimony have been bound together after irradiation for up to 20 days in a nuclear reactor.
He says that mercury antimony oxide is produced in “relatively large quantities” at a chemicals factory in Yekaterinburg. Red mercury itself, he claims, was first produced in 1965 in a cyclotron at the nuclear research centre at Dubna, near Moscow, and is now made at “a number” of Russian military centres, including Krasnoyarsk in Siberia and Penza, 500 kilometres southeast of Moscow. One Russian scientist estimates that Russia produces about 60 kilograms of red mercury a year.
Barnaby argues that the gel, as well as having possible uses in fission weapons, could yield enough chemical energy when compressed to fuse tritium atoms and produce a thermonuclear explosion. The gel may already be incorporated in Russian neutron weapons, such as the M-1975 240-millimetre mortar, he says.
If this is true, red mercury would be a remarkable material which could have dramatic implications for energy production as well as weapons technology. But its existence is doubted, not just by the British, US and German governments (This Week, 6 June 1992), but also by independent critics. Two of the most notable are Joseph Rotblat, emeritus professor of physics at the University of London, and Ted Taylor, a leading bomb designer at the US nuclear weapons laboratory at Los Alamos in New Mexico in the 1950s.
Taylor points out that the only conceivable way to obtain the high levels of chemical energy claimed for red mercury would be to dislodge the inner electrons of mercury and antimony. But he argues that it is difficult to see how this could produce a substance that was stable long enough to be used as an explosive. “I would bet that it does not exist,” he says.
Despite his scepticism, Taylor believes that the potential implications of red mercury are so significant that it ought to be investigated. The discovery of a material that could release hundreds or thousands of times more chemical energy than TNT could be “more important than nuclear fission”, he says. It could revolutionise space travel as well as making possible a fearsome new category of nuclear fusion weapons. “I hope it’s all wrong, but maybe I’m slipping into wishful thinking,” he says. He agrees with Barnaby and Cohen that trade in tritium ought to be subject to the same safeguards as plutonium and highly enriched uranium, the essential ingredients of fission bombs.
Cohen, however, claims that red mercury is one of a new class of highly explosive materials under secret investigation by nuclear weapons scientists in the US. He quotes a memorandum which he received recently from Sandia National Laboratories, the nuclear weapons engineering centre in New Mexico, which describes such materials as “ballotechnic”. According to the memo, this means that “under certain conditions” the chemical energy obtained “can be greater than with high explosives”.
Bob Graham, a senior researcher at Sandia, says that he coined the term “ballotechnics” to describe devices which produce heat following exposure to shock. But he insists that it has no connection with red mercury, which he does not believe exists. “Graham is not free to speak openly about this,” counters Cohen. “I am.” (see Diagram)
Make-up of red mercury fusion bomb
Holloway's commentary:
Red Mercury is the answer to how the Russians made it through America's security for WTC-93, OKC-95 and 9-11. And, why evidence of chemical explosives were not found in the WTC 93 and OKC [1]. These bombs were the counter to the roll out of SDI which took place during the 1970's. This is the time the Soviets manufactured these weapons, according to GRU defector Stanislav Lunev. This is also in line with the 1975 establishment of the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST).
1. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/archive/special/9704a/04wtc97.htm
Witness Says Expert Lied At Bomb Trial (Published 2004). (2004). Retrieved 28 May 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/20/us/witness-says-expert-lied-at-bomb-trial.html
THIS WEEK 29 April 1995
Cherry red and very dangerous
By Rob Edwards
“RED MERCURY”, a uniquely powerful chemical explosive which has been dismissed by many experts as a myth, could be real, and it could pose a serious threat to the world’s attempts to control the spread of nuclear weapons. New information leaked from South Africa, Russia and the US has convinced leading nuclear weapons scientists that the chemical’s potential risks should now be taken seriously.
The scientists, who include Sam Cohen, the American nuclear physicist who invented the neutron bomb, and Frank Barnaby, the former director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, are worried that red mercury could make it much easier for nations or terrorist groups to construct small but deadly thermonuclear fusion weapons. They are calling for the 178-nation conference on the future of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, due to end in New York in two weeks, to introduce tougher controls on the international trade in tritium, one of the raw materials of the fusion bomb.
“I don’t want to sound melodramatic,” says Cohen, who worked on the Manhattan Project to build the atom bomb in the 1940s and was a nuclear weapons adviser to the US government with the Rand Corporation for 20 years. “But red mercury is real and it is terrifying. I think it is part of a terrorist weapon that potentially spells the end of organised society.” He claims that it could be used to make a baseball-sized neutron bomb capable of killing everyone within about 600 metres of the explosion.
Barnaby, a respected nuclear weapons analyst who has been investigating red mercury for the past six years, is more cautious. He accepts that there have been many cases in which offers of red mercury for sale at enormous prices have turned out to be hoaxes. But he believes “on the balance of probabilities” that a mercury-based high explosive which could revolutionise the design of nuclear weapons was developed within the former Soviet Union.
The latest evidence Barnaby has seen is two documents leaked to Greenpeace, apparently from a former mercury production plant in South Africa. The documents detail chemical specifications for a substance called “red mercury 20:20”; a compound of pure mercury and mercury antimony oxide (Hg2Sb2O7) described as “cherry red” and “semi-liquid”. The documents seem to form part of a request from an unknown buyer for the supply of “4-10 flasks per month” of the substance.
One of the documents, dated 2 April 1990, is addressed to Wolfgang Dolich at the British-owned Thor Chemical company at Speyer, near Mannheim in Germany. Dolich, who was a sales manager at the time and is now the company’s German director, could not remember who had sent him the document, nor could he decipher whose illegible signature it bears. But he thinks the document is likely to be one of the many requests that he used to receive for mercury products. He says that he probably passed it on to his company’s sister plant at Cato Ridge in Natal, South Africa, where mercury compounds were manufactured until a few years ago.
But Dolich told New Scientist that nothing could have come of the request because Thor, which runs chemicals businesses in seven countries from its headquarters in Margate, Kent, had never been involved in the manufacture of red mercury.
The document also contains a handwritten note saying “Herewith all we have on red mercury” and signed “Alan”. Dolich thinks this is likely to be Alan Kidger, Thor’s Johannesburg-based sales director who was mysteriously murdered in November 1991. South African police investigators believe that Kidger’s murder could be linked to a clandestine trade in red mercury, although the company denies this.
Barnaby regards the specifications in the documents as scientifically credible, although they are not always easy to understand. They are similar to others he has seen from Russia, Germany and Austria and reinforce his view that there is a significant international trade in red mercury. In association with two other senior scientists from Italy and the US, whom he declined to name, he is now actively trying to acquire a small sample of red mercury so that its alleged properties can be properly tested in a laboratory.
Barnaby’s group has talked to four unnamed scientists in Russia. Barnaby says all four provided detailed information about red mercury. As a result Barnaby has concluded that it is a polymer with a gel-like consistency in which mercury and antimony have been bound together after irradiation for up to 20 days in a nuclear reactor.
He says that mercury antimony oxide is produced in “relatively large quantities” at a chemicals factory in Yekaterinburg. Red mercury itself, he claims, was first produced in 1965 in a cyclotron at the nuclear research centre at Dubna, near Moscow, and is now made at “a number” of Russian military centres, including Krasnoyarsk in Siberia and Penza, 500 kilometres southeast of Moscow. One Russian scientist estimates that Russia produces about 60 kilograms of red mercury a year.
Barnaby argues that the gel, as well as having possible uses in fission weapons, could yield enough chemical energy when compressed to fuse tritium atoms and produce a thermonuclear explosion. The gel may already be incorporated in Russian neutron weapons, such as the M-1975 240-millimetre mortar, he says.
If this is true, red mercury would be a remarkable material which could have dramatic implications for energy production as well as weapons technology. But its existence is doubted, not just by the British, US and German governments (This Week, 6 June 1992), but also by independent critics. Two of the most notable are Joseph Rotblat, emeritus professor of physics at the University of London, and Ted Taylor, a leading bomb designer at the US nuclear weapons laboratory at Los Alamos in New Mexico in the 1950s.
Taylor points out that the only conceivable way to obtain the high levels of chemical energy claimed for red mercury would be to dislodge the inner electrons of mercury and antimony. But he argues that it is difficult to see how this could produce a substance that was stable long enough to be used as an explosive. “I would bet that it does not exist,” he says.
Despite his scepticism, Taylor believes that the potential implications of red mercury are so significant that it ought to be investigated. The discovery of a material that could release hundreds or thousands of times more chemical energy than TNT could be “more important than nuclear fission”, he says. It could revolutionise space travel as well as making possible a fearsome new category of nuclear fusion weapons. “I hope it’s all wrong, but maybe I’m slipping into wishful thinking,” he says. He agrees with Barnaby and Cohen that trade in tritium ought to be subject to the same safeguards as plutonium and highly enriched uranium, the essential ingredients of fission bombs.
Cohen, however, claims that red mercury is one of a new class of highly explosive materials under secret investigation by nuclear weapons scientists in the US. He quotes a memorandum which he received recently from Sandia National Laboratories, the nuclear weapons engineering centre in New Mexico, which describes such materials as “ballotechnic”. According to the memo, this means that “under certain conditions” the chemical energy obtained “can be greater than with high explosives”.
Bob Graham, a senior researcher at Sandia, says that he coined the term “ballotechnics” to describe devices which produce heat following exposure to shock. But he insists that it has no connection with red mercury, which he does not believe exists. “Graham is not free to speak openly about this,” counters Cohen. “I am.” (see Diagram)
Make-up of red mercury fusion bomb
Holloway's commentary:
Red Mercury is the answer to how the Russians made it through America's security for WTC-93, OKC-95 and 9-11. And, why evidence of chemical explosives were not found in the WTC 93 and OKC [1]. These bombs were the counter to the roll out of SDI which took place during the 1970's. This is the time the Soviets manufactured these weapons, according to GRU defector Stanislav Lunev. This is also in line with the 1975 establishment of the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST).
1. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/archive/special/9704a/04wtc97.htm
Witness Says Expert Lied At Bomb Trial (Published 2004). (2004). Retrieved 28 May 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/20/us/witness-says-expert-lied-at-bomb-trial.html
Friday, 17 August 2018
NONE DARE CALL IT GENOCIDE
During the course of the 20th Century the American Ruling Class (ARC) committed a genocide that claimed the lives of 68 million Russians. The ARC supported Hitler as a "bulwark" against the Russians in the 1930's and then unleashed his Nazis on Russia killing anywhere from 27 to 42 million Russians [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The genocide of WW2 is widely known. The genocide that occurred in the years following the end of the Cold War is not widely known. In the 1990's America pushed "economic reforms" known as "shock therapy." America's prescribed "shock therapy" killed millions. Even Western controlled institutions such as UNICEF and The LANCET acknowledge a body count going well into the millions [7], [8], [9]. The counts go as high as 10 million. The Russians claim that 26.5 million of their people were killed by Yeltsin and his Chicago Boy masters in the 1990's. All of this is just swept under the rug of course by American politicians. None of them will admit to the carnage the ARC caused in Russia in the 1990's nor will they admit to the blow-back that came from it in the form of tactical nuclear strikes on CONUS. WTC-93, OKC 95 and 911 were Russian retaliatory strikes on America.
SOURCES:
1. Bershidsky, Leonid. "A Message To Putin From 42 Million Dead The Soviet Union's World War II Losses May Far Exceed The Official Count.". Bloomberg.Com, 2017, https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-05-10/a-message-to-putin-from-42-million-dead. Accessed 18 Aug 2018.
2. Black, Edwin. IBM And The Holocaust. 1st ed., Crown, 2001.
https://www.amazon.com/IBM-Holocaust-Strategic-Alliance-Corporation/dp/0609607995/
3. Black, Edwin. Nazi Nexus: America's Corporate Connections To Hitler's Holocaust. 1st ed., Dialog Press, 2009.
https://www.amazon.com/Nazi-Nexus-Corporate-Connections-Holocaust/dp/0914153099/
4. Higham, Charles. American Swastika: The Shocking Story Of Nazi Collaborators In Our Midst From 1933 To The Present Day. 1st ed., Doubleday, 1985.
https://www.amazon.com/American-Swastika-Shocking-Collaborators-Present/dp/0385178743/
5. Higham, Charles. TRADING WITH THE ENEMY. 1st ed., Barnes And Noble, 1983.
https://www.amazon.com/Trading-Enemy-expos%C3%A9-Nazi-American-1933-1949/dp/0440090644/
6. Sutton, Antony C. Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler. Clairview, 2010.
https://www.amazon.com/Wall-Street-Hitler-Antony-Sutton/dp/0945001533/
7. "Lancet Study Confirms Millions Died From "Shock Therapy"". Daily Kos, 2018, https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2009/1/18/685673/-. Accessed 18 Aug 2018.
8. Stuckler, David et al. "Mass Privatisation And The Post-Communist Mortality Crisis: A Cross-National Analysis". THE LANCET, vol 373, no. 9661, 2009, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60005-2/abstract. Accessed 18 Aug 2018.
9. The MONEE Project CEE/CIS/Baltics. A Decade Of Transition. UNICEF, Florence, Italy, 2001, https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/monee8/eng/3.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2018.
In this March 1990 video Alexander Zinoviev predicts that Boris Yeltsin will destroy the Soviet Union. The debate was broadcast on French TV. He was right on the money.
Putin does not mince his words too much in this video. He mentions the dire circumstances facing Russia during his rise to power in 1998. Two months after his appointment as head of the FSB, the African Embassy bombings took place. America struck back ten days later throwing the Russian economy into chaos. Ultimately the back in forth between Russia and the US led to 911, an attack that foiled America's doomsday plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




















