Sunday, 5 August 2018

THE CODES TO THE USSR'S TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS WERE SEIZED BY THE AUGUST COUP PLOTTERS IN 1991

Herald Sun
August 27, 1991 Tuesday
YELTSIN N-VETO
LENGTH: 542 words

THE Russian republic wants a veto over the Soviet Union's nuclear weapons. Russian Vice-President Alexander Rutskoi said the republic was seeking the veto after the disclosure that the Soviet coup plotters seized the codes for launching the country's tactical nuclear weapons. And Russian leader Boris Yeltsin said today his federation also reserved the right to question its borders with any republic that withdrew from the union. There are already suggestions that Russia take the USSR's seat at the United Nations Security Council.

The Russian President's statement seems certain to send shivers across the other 14 republics of the Soviet Union. With virtually every inter-republican frontier a potential source of dispute, Mr Gorbachev's Union Treaty had declared all borders inviolable. The treaty as it stands is all but finished. Mr Yeltsin's spokesman, Pavel Voshchanov, said the warning mainly referred to northern Kazakhstan and to the Donbass region and the Crimea in the Ukraine.

"If these republics enter the (renewed) Union with Russia it is not a problem," he said.
Mr Rutskoi said the revelation about the nuclear codes falling into the hands of the coup plotters at the weekend raised questions about the security of the vast nuclear arsenal in times of turmoil.
The plotters who approached President Gorbachev at his Crimean villa on Sunday seized a briefcase containing the launch codes, but apparently could not have used them without his help.
Co-operation was also required from a top Defence Ministry official and the military's General Staff, according to the editor of Jane's Soviet High Command, Richard Woff. He said he believed the Soviet system for deploying the weapons rendered the coup plotters incapable of using them.

"He would then have had to co-ordinate the other two points of the triad," Woff said of those who held the codes. "And I don't think he'd have been able to do this. "There would have been someone on the General Staff who would have sensed the madness of this and would have pulled the plug." The new Soviet Defence Minister, Yevgeny Shaposhnikov, also denied that the coup plotters - some of whom may still be at large - ever had the ability to launch a nuclear strike.

But Woff, in an interview, said the seizure of the codes constituted a serious breach of security nonetheless. "There was a very serious possibility of the codes falling into the wrong hands," he said. "If they did get hold of this case, why were they allowed to get hold of it?" US Defence Secretary Dick Cheney told NBC television on Sunday that the codes were retrieved after the coup collapsed last Wednesday and were returned safely to the central government. "Most of the strategic systems that we are most concerned about are in the Russian Republic," Mr Cheney said. "They appear to be, at this point, clearly under the control of the central government."

Hundreds of nuclear weapons remain, however, in Soviet republics trying to break away from the central government.But Woff said those republics would be incapable of launching the weapons.
Apart from Russia, other strategic weapons are thought to be deployed in the Ukraine and in Kazakhstan.
- AGENCIES


Saturday, 4 August 2018

The American Ruling Class (ARC) had the technology to weaponize space long before the Soviets. The question is did they use it? America is run by sociopathic capitalists that care nothing for their own population. They let their own people live and die in the streets. They refuse to give their people universal health care. The capitalist medical system bankrupts millions of Americans. The ARC has refused to recognize and provide any of the economic rights outlined in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights to their people. They intentionally impoverish their own citizens in order to make them wage slaves. The real question is why wouldn't the American Ruling Class secretly weaponize space? They have no ethics or morals to stop them, so of course they did it.

Thursday, 2 August 2018

CONE SHAPED UFOS WERE EJECTED REACTORS FROM FLYING NUCLEAR TEST BEDS




The reports of cone shaped UFOs go back to the late 1940's. These UFO's are associated with radioactive soil samples and EMP effects. The speed of the object in the 07 January 1948 sighting is in line with the cruising speed of the B-36. Much of the UFO sighting data is in line with experiments that would have been needed to build an nuclear powered airplane. The emergency plan for the NB-36 was to eject the reactor core by parachute, if there were any problems with the reactor. Paratroopers in a chase plane would then deploy with help from the local police in order to secure the reactor (Wolverton 55). The cone shaped UFO's can be explained as being ejected cores from experimental planes. Some of these parachutes had streamers on them in order determine their direction.




In 1953 Secretary of Defense Charles E Wilson described the nuclear plane "The atomic powered aircraft reminds me of a shitepoke, a great big bird that flies over marshes, the doesn't have too much body or speed to it or anything but can fly." What is interesting about this quote is that it presupposes that a flying nuclear plane is already flying. It is also notable that shitepokes are known for shitting while in flight. Wilson was making a simile between NB-36 that had been in the air since the mid-1940's to the shitepoke. The shit in this case is the nuclear reactor being ejected from the NB-36. 


Bibliography - Sources 

Wolverton, Mark. "Winged Atom". American History, February 2003, pp. 50-56. 



7 January 1948
Central and south-central Kentucky, near Ft. Knox and other sites. About 1-3:50 and 4:45-7:06 p.m.(CST). Mantell case. At about 1:00 p.m., Kentucky State Police phoned USAF Godman Field Commanding Officer Col. Guy F. Hix’s office reporting an unidentified object near Elizabethtown, Ky., (15 mi S of Godman). Another call to Godman’s CO came from State Police at about 1:10 p.m. of observation by civilian in Madisonville (90 mi WSW of Godman) through Finch telescope of coneshaped object, estimated 100 ft high by 43 ft wide, height 4 miles, speed 10 mph.

This was apparently the Skyhook balloon Flight B, 70 x 30 ft, height 15 miles, speed 27 mph, heading 150° about SE, which passed about 40 miles to SW-SSW of Madisonville at 12-1 p.m. thus was within visibility range. Then still another call came from Lexington (80 mi E of Godman and far beyond visibility of the Skyhook balloon), the first of about 35 calls received by Hix’s office.

At 1:20 p.m. another report of [another UFO] a 250-300 ft unidentified “circular” object over Mansville [Maysville? 120 mi ENE of Godman?], Ky., moving W at “a pretty good clip” [300 mph??],sighted by State Police first radioed then phoned (at 1:30?) to Ft Knox Military Police and Godman Field CO Col. Hix.

Between 1:20 and 2 p.m., Army Flight Service reported to Godman Army Air Field Control Tower, Ft. Knox, Ky., (37°54’23” N, 85°58’00” W, about 725 ft elevation) that the object was over Irvington (15 mi W of Godman) then Owensboro (60 mi W of Godman), Ky. [possibly 130 mi from Maysville to Irvington in 20-30 mins = 260-390 mph or roughly 300 mph].

Godman Tower operator Tech/Sgt Quentin A. Blackwell, Capt James F. Duesler, Jr., base air inspector Lt Col. E. Garrison Wood, and other USAF personnel sighted round white or silver or ice-cream cone-shaped UFO with revolving red streamer, to the S from base [apparently the same object hovering near Elizabethtown 15 mi S of Godman] beginning at 1:50 p.m., including many others such as Ops Ofcr Capt Cary W. Carter at 2:07 p.m.. onward and Col. Hix beginning about 2:10 p.m.

Approaching flight of 4 F-51D fighters came from the SSE, led by Kentucky ANG pilot Capt Thomas F. Mantell, Jr., who was overheard by Godman Tower giving radio position report to their home base Standiford Field, Louisville, Ky., at 2:50 p.m. Godman broke in over the radio to request Mantell intercept and identify UFO at about 210° azimuth from Godman Tower (soon corrected to 205°), “slightly lower” than the sun [at about 14°] as reported by Mantell’s wingman [thus about 10-12° elevation, altitude about 15,000 ft].

UFO maintained constant angular position including elevation angle as seen from Godman Tower as it apparently receded on azimuth heading 205°, during most of Mantell’s pursuit, which required altitude of 50,000 to 60,000 ft to be reached at 60-70 miles distance at a recession velocity of about 240 mph, increasing to 300 mph when Mantell approached, but otherwise still maintaining constant position in the sky to Godman observers.

Flying at 300 mph and gradually climbing to about 22,000 to 23,000 ft, Mantell overtook the UFO from below, past Bowling Green about 70-75 miles from Godman, at about 3:10 p.m. when in one of Mantell’s last radio reports to Godman Tower he described UFO as “metallic and tremendous in size.” Mantell went into war emergency (combat) maximum climb rate [2,000ft/min at altitude] to reach UFO nearly overhead, but lost

27 April 1949
SE of Killeen Base/Site B [Nuclear Weapons National Stockpile], Camp Hood, Texas (31°3’53” N, 97°49’40” W). 9:35 [9:25?] p.m. (CST).
Army security patrol, Lt. Howard Kitterman, PFC Leslie Lockhart, Pvt. Clement DeAmicis, Pvt. Joseph P. Landry, 6th Tank Battalion, sighted a 4-inch bright light with no glare, with a 3-4-inch metallic cone trailing in the back, 600 ft away 6-7 ft above ground silently approaching from azimuth 40° (about NE) in level flight at 60-70 mph heading directly towards them on heading 220°, starting curving path, disappearing suddenly in the SW at 150 ft away.

At 9:37 p.m. the same witnesses saw a 2-inch white light appear 100 ft away to the NNE flying in a zigzag in level flight about 6 ft above ground, disappearing suddenly.
At 9:39 p.m. the same witnesses saw a 3rd light in the WSW. (Sparks; BB Maxwell Microfilm Roll 5, p. 628; FOIA; Saunders/FUFOR Index; Jan Aldrich)

28 April 1949
SE of Killeen Base/Site B [Nuclear Weapons National Stockpile], Camp Hood, Texas (31° 3’53” N, 97°49’40” W). 8:30, 8:37, 8:40, 9:00, 9:10, 9:30 p.m. Several Army security patrols sighted a variety of strange lights, mostly slow-moving changing color from white to red to green, one with a red blinking light, one with a "cone-shaped affair" trailing in the rear similar toone seen the day before. (Sparks; FOIA)

20 June 1952
Near Paulette, Mississippi (at 33° 2' N, 88°26' W). 8:26 p.m. USAF pilot Lt. Milo Roberts and bombardier Lt. Julius Prottengeier with 308th Bomb Sq, 310th Bomb Wing, Forbes AFB, Kansas, flying a B-29 bomber (s/n 44-62204) at 190 mph at 17,000 ft saw a cone-shaped object approach on collision course from the 2 o'clock position, before evasive action object made sharp left left and disappeared, followed by a 2nd object [?]. Object's length/width ratio 3:1, about 8-10 ft long at 1,200- 1,500 ft away or 100 ft if at 15 miles away. (Sparks; NARCAP; BB files??)

26 August 1952
Lathrop Wells, Nevada. 12:10 a.m. USAF Capt. D. A. Woods saw a large spherical very bright object with a V-shaped contrail, a dark cone in the center, approach at 1,000 mph, hover briefly, make an instant 90°-180° turn, then a gentle climb and final sudden acceleration leaving blue-white contrail which evaporated immediately. No sound. (Sparks; Berliner; cf. Hynek-CUFOS re-eval; Jan Aldrich)

02 August 1953
Saraland, Alabama (at 30°48' N, 88°4' W). Between 4:30 and 5:30 [6?] p.m. Woman named Hughes in her backyard looking to the NE saw a highly polished spinning top or cone-shaped object reflecting the sun at low altitude traveling from NW to SE. (Sparks; Hynek- CUFOS-Willy Smith files; Saunders/FUFOR Index)

June 25, 1954.
Indian Lake, Ohio. 5:05 p.m. Experienced private pilot John Mark, flying Navion lightplane, saw a 60 ft silver or aluminum round object with a flat bottom, raised front edge, inverted cone on top, fly horizontally, hover, make a high-g pull up and then a steep climb into an overcast. Radar at Dayton, Ohio, airport, tracked very fast target at same location. (Sparks; Berliner)

29 July 1954.
About 3 miles SSE of Carysfort Reef Lighthouse, Key Largo, Florida (at about 25°10' N, 80°12'W). 3:40 a.m. Key West Naval Base USN Chief Quartermaster Milbert James Brown and Helmsman Seaman Sydney J. Martin aboard USS YTB-543 sailing S on 205° true course at 6.5 knots saw a huge, bright pale blue or whitish-blue egg or blimp-shaped 300-500 ft object with 4 pointed cones of light, major/minor axis about 3:1 oriented horizontally, angular size 3x sun, traveling at tremendous speed estimated at about 7,200 mph (better estimate about 5,000 mph) in level horizontal flight from the W through S then E then NE, at 10°-12° above the horizon passing in front of mostly cumulus clouds covering 30% up to 15° elevation. Brown first saw the object at about 243° azimuth 10° elevation about 4 miles away moving to the left heading E viewed across the bow of the ship to the SSW at which point he began stopwatch timing (6.3 secs at disappearance, azimuths measured immediately after sighting by reference to 5 ships and a landmark used as sighting fix points). Object passed through point of closest approach at about 160° azimuth12° elevation 1-1/2 miles away, moving to the left through a gradual-arc flight path of about 8 miles radius of curvature (about 40 g's centripetal acceleration), passed through E along a now straightened path headed to the NE, reaching maximum N position at 70° azimuth about 8 miles away when it curved slightly back as if veering off sharply to the right to head E, disappearing at about 68° azimuth 10° elevation 9 miles away behind a cloud bank. No sound or trail. (Sparks; Jan Aldrich)

06 November 1957
Montville, Ohio (41.62° N, 81.06° W). 11:30 [11:20] p.m. (EST). Olden J. Moore, 28, a plasterer, while driving home suddenly saw an object like a bright meteor split into two pieces, one going straight up, the other getting larger while color changing from bright white to blue-green. Object hovered 200 ft above a field close to ground, 500 ft away, with a soft whirring sound. After 15 mins, Moore walked to the object, which was shaped like "a covered dish" 50 ft in diameter, 15 ft high, with a cone on top about 10 ft high, surrounded by haze or fog, pulsating slowly. Holes, footprints and decaying radioactivity found at the site by Civil Defense Director Kenneth Locke about 12 (?) hours later, a maximum of 150 microoentgens/hour at the center of a 100-foot UFO hovering/landing site area, decaying to 20 microR/hr 3 hours later, suggestive of an approximately 1-hour radionuclide half-life. (Sparks; Vallée Magonia 433; Michel-Mebane 1958; BB files)

09 July 1959.
Jamaica & Bahamas. 8:06-8:15 p.m. (EST). Trans Canada pilot Capt F. F. Beckett and First Officer J. Bosma at Ocho Rios, Jamaica (at 18.4° N, 77.1° W), hotel manager (?) W. B. Street, and others at Falconbridge Hotel, Ocho Rios, Jamaica, first spotted by Bosma and Street at 8:06 then called to Beckett’s attention at 8:07, when it was at about 5° azimuth and 25°-30° elevation. Beckett’s drawing shows object’s flight path dipping down to about 20° then rising up to disappear at about azimuth 30°-40° elevation 25°-30°. 

Oval translucent haze or shape appeared around central object. Possibly object was Jupiter IRBM launched from Cape Canaveral at 8:01 p.m. EST. Beckett’s and other witnesses’ timing put sighting after Jupiter IRBM rocket engines and nose cone separation would have shut down or ended at about 8:04 p.m. Jupiter missile would not have been visible through the vented propellant cloud given the already extreme dimness. 

Jupiter rocket body 45 ft long would have barely been visible at ~620 to 700+ miles slant range distance (when first seen mag. +3 to +5 depending on calculation but if obscured by the vent cloud then totally invisible) and the separated 15 ft nose cone not at all (mag. +5 or dimmer if not seen through vent cloud). Beckett estimated stellar magnitude of object as “much brighter” than +2nd magnitude, comparable to a planet, or to aircraft landing light at 20 miles (about mag. –1). (Sparks; BB files; McDonald list; Ted Molczan; Printy)

28 July 1964.
Lake Chelan, Wash. 10:30 p.m. Former Navy pilot and another man, at work in a field saw an intense light, cone-shaped, emitted from the ground and a similar light in the sky, alternating which was on and off. A round, aluminum-looking object, about 30 ft in diameter, with one red and one white light, then appeared and descended to ground with a strong whistling sound similar to a small jet, piercing and high-pitched voices similar to those of children playing were heard. Before this object took off a low-flying jet circled its position. The densely wooded area was explored by helicopter and on foot 3-4 days later by Sheriff Nickell and a USAF officer, but nothing was found. (Sparks; Vallée Magonia 619)

07 January 1966.
[Holloway’s note] This is a likely sign of EMP.
3 miles SW of Georgetown (5 miles NE of Wilmer), Alabama. 3:17 p.m. Civilian had to stop his car when he found object landed on the road blocking his way. Round silver color object 10-12 [25?] ft diameter with 8- 10-inch ring or hoop at equator, 5 ft hatch on bottom, [and a cone with a flashing green light?] hovered about 5 ft above ground at 20 ft away, gradually climbed to NE, engine [whirring?] noise increasing, then rapid acceleration to disappearance in a few secs. Watch stopped [engine had died and now could be restarted?].
[Sulfur or rotten-egg smell noted?] (Sparks; Hynek UFO
Rpt p. 42; Vallée Magonia 721)

20 March 1966.
Dexter, Mich. 8-8:30 p.m. Frank Mannor and his son, Ronald [plus 40-60 others including 12 policemen ?] saw hovering over a swamp about 1,500 ft away a brown luminous car-sized object, with a "scaly" or "waffled" [or “quilted”] surface, cone-shaped on top, flat on bottom, or football-shaped, and 2 bluish-green lights on right and left edges that turned bright red and helped illuminate object in between. Lights blinked out and object reappeared instantly across the swamp 1,500 ft away. The whole object lit up with a yellowish glow at one point and also rose up 500 ft then descended again. After 2-3 mins of viewing, when 2 flashlights appeared in the distance the object seemed to respond by flying away at high speed directly over the witnesses with a whistling sound like a rifle bullet ricocheting. Object remained in the swamp area for 1/2 hr. [Various other sightings in the area by police shortly afterward.] (Sparks; Vallée Magonia 731; Todd Lemire; etc.)

05 April 1966.
Alto, Tenn. 11:55 p.m. W. Smith and another stopped to watch an object hovering about 15 ft above a swamp, tried to follow it but it flew away. Object 100 ft long oval with a dark top, appearing cone-shaped when moving, making a high-frequency noise, and flying between a high-tension power line and a row of trees. Animal reactions wherever the object flew over. (Sparks; Berliner; cf. Vallée Magonia 753)

17 April 1966.
Portage County, Ohio, bet. Atwater and Randolph, Ohio, to Pittsburgh, Penna. 5-6:10 a.m. (EST). E of Akron Deputy Sheriff Dale F. Spaur and associate Wilbur Neff saw a 30-45 ft metallic object approach over the treetops from the woods, bathing the witnesses and the whole area in light while making a transformer-like hum, then headed E and they gave chase in the patrol car at speeds up to 105 mph for 85 miles. Officer Wayne Huston about 35 miles to the ESE saw the object he described as ice cream cone-shaped, point downwards, approach from the W and pass overhead at about 800-900 ft height with Spaur and Neff in pursuit to the SE and he joined them near Unity, Ohio, with the object about 1/2 to 3/4 mile ahead of them, reaching the Penna. state line at 5:35. They lost sight of object at Brady Run Park regained it in Bridgeport, Penna. At about this time officers Lonnie Johnson and Ray Esterly in Salem, Ohio, saw 3 jet fighters [two F-102’s] attempting to intercept a bright object at about 10,000-20,000 ft about 25° elevation to the E for about 2 mins. In Conway, Penna., at 6 a.m. they met with officer Frank Panzarella who had been watching the object for 10 mins to the E or SE which he described as 25-35 ft half-football-shaped object at about 1,000 ft height (or 1,500-2,000 ft according to the others), when it stopped in the NE towards Harmony, Penna, then rose. They watched as the object climbed to about 3,500 ft to the left of andlevel with the quarter moon in the ESE (which was at about azimuth 116° elevation 14° aand 11% illuminated at 6:00 a.m.) and Venus (at 122° azimuth 22° elevation) and it passed near a 707 airliner taking off from Pittsburgh Airport and disappeared shooting up vertically at about 6:10. (Sparks; Hynek UFO Exp ch. 8; NICAP)

27 April 1967
Green Lake, Wisc. 10 p.m. 4 boys with binoculars saw a cone-shaped object with a blue underside, and a top that changed from red to orange to white, come lower with oscillating motions, illuminating the woods 1/2 mile away. (Sparks; Vallée Magonia 838)


DEVELOPMENT OF NEPA/ANP FOLLOWED THE LEXINGTON REPORT OUTLINE FROM 12 MAY1948


Stever, H. G. Minutes of Meeting Held May 12 and13, 1948 Between Representatives of NEPA and Project Lexington and AEC.. United States: N. p., 1948. Web.

Document from 12-13 May 1948 Lexington Project Meeting Minutes 

The timeline shows that work on the direct nuclear turbojet was completed/perfected in 1951. It produced the Canberra. Next thing work began on the indirect system. It produced the U-2 in 1956. This is when development of the nuclear ramjet and rocket began. In other words this document shows that the nuclear turbojet in both it's direct and indirect forms must have had been perfected by 1956. 

We know from the 25 November 1949 UFO sighting over Mt. Palomar that a nuclear plane was being flight tested in Southern California. Probably a sighting of the NB-36. By 1951 the Canberra was modified to fly above 70,000 feet and run on nuclear power. In 1952 it was overflying the Soviet Union. In 1956 the nuclear U-2 was deployed. 1956 is when the development of the nuclear ramjet began under Project PLUTO. In 1959 the experiments on the Nuclear Rocket began under Project ROVER. 

We know from the 1949 LA Times article that they were already looking at high altitude planes for the NEPA program. 


LOS ANGELES TIMES 27 SEPTEMBER 1949

Tuesday, 26 June 2018

PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH KNOW 911 CAN HAPPEN AGAIN



Pilots for 911 truth are an industry organization dedicated to covering the ass of the airlines. They promote the missile and modified planes theories. Theories that assert no airliners were hijacked. Because who the hell would want to get on a plane knowing that 911 could happen again? The planes on 911 were remotely hijacked. 



The hit on the Pentagon's DIA/NOC offices show this to be the case. The Honeywell Avionics systems were hacked by the Russians turning the airliners into cruise missiles. Russian defector Stanislav Lunev revealed that the FSB/GRU had penetrated Honeywell and other American tech firms in the late 1990's [5]. In 1997 Russian avionics producer Aviapribor was licensed to produce avionics for Honeywell. 



John Lear is also someone from within the industry promoting the same line for what must be essentially the same reasons. Honeywell and Learjet have relationship that goes back decades. Learjet also had close ties to avionics manufacturer AlliedSignal [2]. AlliedSignal merged with Honeywell in the 1990's. 



In 1999 pro golfer Payne Stewart died tragically, when avionics on his Learjet 35-A "malfunctioned" [3]. It was surmised that his plane rapidly depressurized killing everyone on board. The Stewart incident was a trial run for 911. The people on board the electronically hijacked flights of 911 were all dead from asphyxiation. This would have to take place in order to stop the pilots from manually overriding the auto pilot hack.  



911 could happen again anytime because the planes were electronically hijacked. In fact recently in 2015, the flight controls of a United Airlines plane were hacked by a man through the entertainment system demonstrating that this could happen again [6]. 



Money matters more than anything else in America. It matters more than the lives of the American people who fly everyday. 




SOURCES:

  1. Aerospace.honeywell.com. (2018). Bombardier Learjet 40 / 45. [online] Available at: https://aerospace.honeywell.com/en/platforms/bombardier-learjet-40 [Accessed 26 Jun. 2018].
  2. Flightglobal.com. (2018). Learjet. [online] Available at: https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/learjet-19566/ [Accessed 26 Jun. 2018].
  3. Flightglobal.com. (1999). Learjet 35 crash investigators focus on pressure drop. [online] Available at: https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/learjet-35-crash-investigators-focus-on-pressure-drop-57880/ [Accessed 26 Jun. 2018].
  4. Flysimware.com. (2018). LEARJET 35A. [online] Available at: https://www.flysimware.com/website/LEARJET_35A.html [Accessed 26 Jun. 2018].
  5. Lunev, S. and Winkler, I. (1998). Through the eyes of the enemy. Washington, DC: Regnery Pub.
  6. Zetter, Kim et al. "Feds Say That Banned Researcher Commandeered A Plane". WIRED, 2018, https://www.wired.com/2015/05/feds-say-banned-researcher-commandeered-plane/. Accessed 6 July 2018.

Sunday, 20 May 2018

GLOBAL GUARDIAN EXERCISES WERE NORMALLY HELD IN OCTOBER/NOVEMBER

9-11 Inside Jobbers often cite the GLOBAL GUARDIAN exercises as evidence that 9-11 was an inside job. They fail to mention that these exercises are regularly held in October or November.  If GLOBAL GUARDIAN was held on 9-11, then it was moved up a month. This schedule change went unreported. The GLOBAL GUARDIAN exercises were reportedly scheduled for October as late as 23 March 2001 in the SPACE OBSERVER, a USAF publication from Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado. So, when was the schedule changed?

What really happened? Amid the backdrop of Russian nuclear exercises Russia launched an unconventional nuclear and electronic attack on the United States on 11 September 2001. These were the opening moves of WW3. The United States in response enacted it's doomsday plan putting all of its E-4B "flying Pentagons" into the air. America's doomsday plan is to use airborne command and control to coordinate its strategic response. These airborne command and control centers hide in the "big sky." Some of the leadership hid in bunkers on the ground. Vice President Cheney hid in the PEOC under the White House for most of the day. But on 9-11 America's doomsday plans failed due to Russian communications jamming. This forced Bush to land Air Force One at Offutt AFB in Nebraska. Bush had to land, if he wanted to give the order to launch the missiles. Bush's landing at Offutt was essentially checkmate because the whereabouts of the President were now known and he could be targeted by Russia, if they had decided to attack with nuclear shaped charges. A 1 kiloton nuclear shaped charge can put a 10 foot diameter hole 1000 feet long in solid granite. President Bush would have been killed, if Russia had decided to follow up their unconventional attack and launch a full scale nuclear attack on 9-11.

So, the Bush Administration claimed that GLOBAL GUARDIAN  exercises took place on 911 in order to cover-up the fact that America's doomsday/contingency of government plans had been put into effect and nullified by Russian communications jamming. 

SOURCES: 




APOLLO GUARDIAN 


http://www.basicint.org:80/pubs/Research/taking_pulse-3.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20021121172909/http://www.basicint.org:80/pubs/Research/taking_pulse-3.htm#Planning

Taking the Pulse of the US Nuclear Arsenal

Fighter-Bomber Aircraft

The U.S. Air Force has several dozen fighter-bomber aircraft assigned to nuclear weapon missions with a total of 650 B61 bombs of various types. All non-strategic B61 nuclear weapons in the U.S. are thought to be based at Kirtland AFB in New Mexico and Nellis AFB in Nevada. Approximately 150 bombs are still deployed in seven European countries. The squadrons assigned to nuclear weapons missions, and the munitions personnel and base security force all undergo periodic nuclear weapons training, inspection, and certification.

Listed below the US and European bases where nuclear weapons are based.

Continental U.S. Bases

Holloman AFB, New Mexico

F-117A stealth aircraft of the 49th Wing are assigned to nuclear weapons missions. The aircraft is capable of carrying the B61 bomb.



Cannon AFB, New Mexico

F-16C/D Falcon aircraft of the 27th Wing are assigned to overseas operations with B61 nuclear weapons. The aircraft was also tested to carry the new B61-11 earth penetrating bomb.
European Bases

Kleine Brogel, Belgium
Some ten B61 bombs are based here for delivery by Belgian F-16A/B aircraft of the 10th Tactical Fighter Bomber Wing. U.S. control of weapons assigned to 52nd Munitions Support Squadron.

Büechel Air Base, Germany
About ten B61 stored here are earmarked for delivery by German PA-200 Tornado aircraft from the 33rd Fighter Bomber Wing. U.S. control of weapons assigned to 817th Munitions Support Squadron.

Ramstein Air Base, Germany
Approximately 15 B61 are deployed to the 86th Airlift Wing for delivery by U.S. F-16C/Ds that would deploy from continental United States.

Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany
Some twenty B61 bombs are assigned to the 52nd Fighter Wing.

Araxos Air Base, Greece
Approximately ten B61 bombs are earmarked for delivery by Greek A-7E aircraft of the 116th Combat Wing. Nuclear weapons are controlled by the U.S. 731st Munitions Support Squadron.

Aviano Air Base, Italy
Approximately twenty B61 bombs are assigned for the 31st Fighter Wing.

Ghedi-Torre Air Base, Italy
Approximately ten B61 bombs are earmarked for delivery by Italian PA-200 Tornado aircraft from the 6th Wing. The U.S. 31st Munitions Support Squadron is in control of the weapons.

Volkel, Netherlands
Approximately ten B61 bombs are based here for delivery by Dutch F-16A/B aircraft. The bombs are under control of the U.S. 752nd Munitions Support Squadron.

Incirlik Air Base, Turkey
Some 15 B61 bombs are kept here for delivery by aircraft from the 39th Wing. Control of the bombs is managed by the U.S. 39th Munitions Support Squadron.

RAF Lakenheath, England
Approximately thirty B61 bombs are stored at this base for delivery by U.S. F-15E aircraft of the 48th Fighter Wing.

Nuclear Warheads

The U.S. nuclear arsenal consists of some 8,400 operational warheads of 12 types.

Alterations and modifications are underway on almost all nuclear warhead types. This effort ranges from re-manufacturing of entire warheads to installment of individual components, and includes:

production of W88 warheads;
overhaul of the W76 warhead for the Trident SLBMs;
modernizations/alterations of various types of the B61 bomb including the planned production of primaries;
completing certification of the new B61-11 earth-penetrating bomb;
overhaul of the W87 warhead for the MX/Peacekeeper; and
modernizations to the B83 and the B83 Mod 1 bombs.
Many of these warheads and the fissile materials in them up are subject to a variety of tests and experiments in upcoming years. Types of tests include:

Hydro Tests, or hydrodynamic tests, are, according to the Deparment of Energy (DOE), "high-explosive nonuclear experiments to investigate hydrodynamic aspects of primary function up to mid to late stages of pit implosion." "Hydrodynamic" refers to the study of the motion of fluids.
Subcritical nuclear tests are, again according to the DOE, "scientific experiments to obtain technical information in support of DOE's responsibility to maintain the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear testing. They will involve chemical high explosives to generate high pressures that will be applied to nuclear weapon materials, such as plutonium." See Nevada Test Site and Subcriticals section of the Nuclear Weapons Complex page for more information.
Below is the status of operational warheads in the U.S. arsenal:

W88

Some 384 W88 warheads are deployed on Trident II (D-5) missiles. There are approximately 400 total in the stockpile. Seven laboratory and three stockpile surveillance tests are scheduled for FY1999. All spare warheads will be used for ground and Hydro Tests, and a pit rebuild program to replace those warheads expended in surveillance will start in FY1998. Small-scale re-manufacturing is scheduled to begin at Los Alamos in FY2001. A development flight test for a remanufactured pit-warhead is scheduled for FY2000, and another development flight test is planned for FY2002 under the Replacement Warhead Project.

W87

About 525 W87s are in the stockpile, of which 500 are operational on MX/Peacekeeper missiles. The warhead is described by the DOE as "the most modern and safe warhead in the stockpile," but the W87 is nonetheless undergoing a Life Extension Program (Alt 342) which will modify the design to enhance structural integrity of the warhead.

W87 Warheads
for the MX missile

The W87 is the first warhead in the U.S. arsenal to undergo this process. The project includes above ground experiments and flight testing. Production of replacement parts will begin in FY1999 and the first refurbished warhead is scheduled to be completed in February 1999. Eight laboratory, three flight stockpile surveillance tests, and two Retrofit Evaluation System ground tests are scheduled for FY1999, and an annual Hydro Test is planned for the following three years. After the Peacekeeper is retired, modernized W87 warheads are scheduled to be transferred to some of the Minuteman III missiles the U.S. plans to retain under the START II agreement. This redeployment is scheduled to begin in FY2004. Rebuilding of W87 warheads intended for surveillance will resume in FY2010.

B84

Previously deployed on Ground-Launched Cruise Missiles (GLCMs), B84 warheads are now held in storage in the inactive stockpile. Two Hydro Tests were conducted in 1991 and one in 1998. Another is scheduled for FY2000. Surveillance samples are planned to be retired and the DOE is currently assessing whether to maintain the warhead in the inactive stockpile.

B83

Some 600 B63 warheads are in the arsenal, with about 480 operational on long-range bombers. Under project Alt 750, the bomb is being equipped with a new radar. An upgraded version, designated as B83 Mod 1, is scheduled to begin production in FY1999. Ten laboratory and three flight tests are planned for FY1999.

A B83 after a test drop
by parachute.

Five Hydro Tests were conducted in FY1998, and annual Hydro Tests are scheduled to begin in FY2000 alternating between warheads from the inactive and active stockpile. A new design neutron generator is scheduled to begin production in FY2013.

W80-1/ALCM

Some 400 W80-1/ALCM warheads on Air-Launched Cruise Missiles (ALCMs) are earmarked for delivery by B-52H bombers. ALCMs are being converted to conventional missions and about 940 are in storage with their warheads removed.

For this warhead and the two W80 warheads below, planning is underway to replace the neutron generator, with production scheduled to commence in late 2004. Six laboratory, six flight, and one Hydro Test are scheduled for FY1999.

W80-1/ACM


ACM in flight

Approximately 400 W80-1/ACM warheads in the operational arsenal are deployed on Advanced Cruise Missiles (ACMs) and assigned to long-range bombers. These warheads were originally deployed on ALCMs. The ACM first flew in 1985. It is approximately 20 feet long, 10 feet wide, and weighs in the neighborhood of 3,700 pounds.Its range is purported to be approximately 1,800 miles.
W80-0/SLCM

Approximately 320 W80-0/SCLM warheads on Submarine-Launched Cruise Missiles (SCLMs) are in the operational arsenal for deployment on submarines. These are stored at Yorktown Naval Weapon Station, Virginia, and Bangor, Washington. The SLCM, also known as the Tomahawk, is a long-range cruise missile that can be used against surface ships or land targets, employing conventional or nuclear warheads.

Nuclear-capable
Tomahawk SLCM

The recent US attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan were carried out with conventional Tomahawks. The missile entered submarine service in1983. Tomahawk missiles can be launched from standard 21-inch torpedo tubes on all submarines and, in the later Los Angeles (688I) class submarines, from vertical-launch tubes in the submarine's bow.

W78


W78 Warheads on
Minuteman III nose

About 915 W78 warheads are deployed on 300 Minuteman III missiles. New reservoirs and neutron generators are planned to modernize the warhead and improve performance. A Joint Life Extension Study will be completed in FY1999 to determine options for extending the life of the W78 for the enduring stockpile. Eight laboratory tests and three flight tests are scheduled for FY1999, and a limited Hydro Test series is currently under development with the first explosion planned for FY2001.
W76

Some 3,072 W76 warheads are on 384 Trident I C-4 and Trident II D-5 missiles, with a total of 3,200 in the stockpile. These warheads began Dual Revalidation in FY1996. The Department of Energy reported in March 1998 that it was half way through the project. Completion is scheduled for FY1999. The project is a robust peer review of the warhead's military characteristics, conducted by two independent review teams from the nuclear labs, assessing and evaluating its performance against revalidated military requirements. Three of six hydrodynamic tests were conducted in 1997 and six of 15 Arming, Fuzing and Firing systems were tested to the original production specifications. The major system tests are scheduled to take place in FY1998 and FY1999. The result will provide a modern baseline of the weapon, an evaluation of its current performance in the arsenal, and a new generation of scientists and personnel trained in its operation to ensure the warhead can remain a reliable part of the enduring nuclear arsenal well into the 21st century. Furthermore, under program Alt 317, the warhead is being refitted with a new neutron generator to improve performance. Production is scheduled to begin in 1999. Eight laboratory tests and three flight stockpile surveillance tests are planned for FY1999. A Hydro Test is proposed for FY2000.

W62

Approximately 610 W62 warheads are deployed on 200 Minuteman III missiles. As recent as in 1994, the Pentagon planned to retire W62 warheads in 2003. The warheads are expected to be replaced by W87s from the MX/Peacekeeper when the START II treaty is implemented. The DOE is evaluating whether to extend the life of the W62 for service in the enduring stockpile. Nine laboratory and two flight tests are scheduled for FY1999, and three Hydro Tests will be conducted in the period 1998-2000.

B61-7

Some 300 B61-7 are in the operational stockpile. Another 310 are in storage. Approximately 50 were converted to earth-penetrating missions as the B61-11 bomb. An improved 9S actuator is being installed as part of a Limited Life Component Exchange project (Alt 336), and a new radar is being installed.

For both the B61-7 and the B61-11 below, seven laboratory and four flight tests are scheduled during FY1999. A Hydro Test is planned for FY2001. A new primary for the B61-7/11 bombs will begin production in late 2002.

B61-11

About 50 B61-11 bombs are in the operational stockpile. This weapon is the newest in the US arsenal. First originated in 1993, the Mod 11 is designed as a "bunker buster" - capable of attacking hardened targets underground. The B61-11 is a replacement for the B53, which was assigned the bunker buster role because of its large yield. The Mod 11 is designed to penetrate targets before exploding, and thus in theory does not need as large a yield to fulfil its mission.

A B-2 bomber
drops a B61-11.

Conversion to full operational status of the B61-11 continues at Whiteman AFB, Missouri, and certification activities are expected to be completed in 1998 for standard stockpile acceptance in December 1998. See the B61-7 above for the Mod 11 test schedule.

B61-4/5/10

There are approximately 750 B61-4/5/10 warheads for use on F-15E, F-16, and F-117 aircraft. Several alterations are underway on the B61, including: Alt 335, which installs a Trajectory Sensing Signal Generator; Alt 336, which installs a new CF3087 cable; and Alt 339, which installs a Multiple Code Coded Switch Encryption Translator. A new nose is under development to equip the bomb with a modern radar to maintain system performance. Production is scheduled to begin in late 2002. During FY1999, 11 laboratory and 4 flight tests are scheduled, and the first in a series of biannual Hydrodynamic test is planned for FY2001. Development of a new primary is scheduled for FY2011 with production to begin in FY2012.

New warheads

At the nuclear laboratories, warhead development efforts continue, including a replacement warhead for the Trident II D-5 (Mk5) reentry vehicle, a stand-off glide bomb version (BIOS) of the B61-11 bomb, and several classified projects.

Nuclear War Planning

Nuclear war planning is centered at the U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) in Offutt AFB, Nebraska, which has overall command over all U.S. nuclear weapons. The regional commands at Central Command, European Command, Pacific Command, and Southern Command (this link currently having problems) carry out regional nuclear planning and provide input to STRATCOM.

STRATCOM is responsible for the Single Integrated Operation Plan (SIOP). First drawn up in the early 1960s, the SIOP outlines a range of nuclear attack options coordinating the potential delivery of individual nuclear warheads by bombers, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles against Russia, China, and a number of "rogue" states such as Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, and Syria.

The current war plan that is in effect is SIOP 98, completed in October 1997 shortly before President Clinton issued new guidelines for nuclear war planning (Precidential Decision Directive 60). Planning for SIOP 99 began soon thereafter and the updated nuclear war plan will take effect in October 1998. In December 1998 and January 1999, nuclear planners will begin to update strike plans for bombers, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles. The product of that effort will be SIOP 00, scheduled to take effect in October 1999.

To validate the nuclear war plans, STRATCOM conducts several nuclear war gaming exercises and seminars annually. This includes the Global Archer, Global Gardian, Bulwark Bronze, and Polo Hat exercises. Some of these exercises are conducted by STRATCOM alone or in conjunction with other commands such as Air Combat Command and the regional commands.

The CINC Strategic Planning Series (CSPS) game is conducted at least once a year, typically in early September, shortly before completion of the annual revision of the SIOP. The game generally focuses on near-term SIOP operational readiness or future force structure capabilities addressing such topics as for structure requirements, deterrent contributions, or war-fighting capabilities. It is carried out in support of the CINC, Senior Battle Staff, USSTRATCOM staff, and USSTRATCOM Task Force Commanders.

Global Archer, a large-scale quarterly exercise program, is intended to test, evaluate, and refine procedures and plans for nuclear strike and nuclear follow-up strike scenarios. The Global Archer exercises are accompanied by the Global Support Seminar (GSS) held each year, normally in early February, to explore issues associated with the Theater Nuclear Support (TNS) process. Global Guardian exercises are held in October-November each year to practice TNS operations in tactical nuclear operations in, for example, the European or Pacific theaters.

Nuclear Weapons Complex

In the absence of nuclear weapons test explosions and the halt to the development of "new" nuclear weapons, the United States is designing an ambitious program which involves building a wide range of facilities that will be capable of simulating physical conditions and engineering designs as close to actual nuclear weapons explosion conditions as possible. The Department of Energy plans to spend $4.5 billion on nuclear weapons activities in FY1999, a 15 percent increase in spending over FY1997. Facilities currently under construction will provide the capability to research and develop both primary and secondary aspects of modern nuclear weapons without nuclear weapons test explosions. The two-part objective is, one, to maintain about a dozen different nuclear warhead designs in the operational nuclear arsenal for the indefinite future, and two, remanufacture or modify existing nuclear warheads to replace defect or outdated models to serve current and future missions.

Central to achieving this capability is the construction and/or modernization of hydro-test facilities, advanced lasers, limited production lines, and advanced computer facilities. Hydrodynamic testing is the principle experimental technique for studying the implosion phase of a nuclear weapon, and laser facilities will enable weapons scientists to do on a minute scale what until recently required a live test explosion of a nuclear warhead.

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

In 1998, the U.S. will re-open a production line for the manufacturing of plutonium cores for nuclear warheads. The production will build pits for replacement warheads in the arsenal beginning with Trident II W88 warheads in FY2001. However, already in FY1998, the program will have advanced so far as to begin production of a single pit per year verifying that Los Alamos National Laboratory has the capability to build war reserve pits. In FY1999, manufacturing will begin of a limited number of pits for certification and later deployment into the operational nuclear stockpile. Up to 10 pits will be manufactured per year by FY2001. By FY2007, the year the START II treaty cuts are to have been achieved, the Los Alamos production line will be able to produce 20 new pits a year. In addition, a plan is being developed to allow manufacturing up to 50 pits a year with a single shift of personnel. Development of a contingency plan for producing even larger quantities is on hold until more experience has been obtained from the current production line.

Also under construction at LANL is the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT). When completed, this will be the most advanced facility for hydrodynamic experiments to validate the implosion performance of nuclear warhead primaries. The DARHT will serve as one of the principle tools for evaluating and ensuring the reliability of the nuclear stockpile. Through full-size hydrodynamic tests of non-nuclear mockups, the DARHT will be used to validate the implosion of nuclear weapons primaries. The first axis of the test firing facility will be operational by June 1999 about which time long-lead procurement will begin for other aspects of the facility. A decision is scheduled to be made before 2003 whether to build an advanced hydrotest facility to further enhance the capability to simulate nuclear weapon implosions.

LANL will also be the location of the ATLAS facility, a new pulsed-power machine approved by the DOE in June 1998. When completed in the fall of 2000, ATLAS will be used to simulate the implosion of plutonium in nuclear warheads. By using intense bursts of electrical current directed against a small target, samples of plutonium will implode, compressing the material to extreme pressures similar to those inside an exploding nuclear warhead. ATLAS will have the capability to simulate both nuclear weapons primaries and secondaries. Construction cost is $43 million and ATLAS is expected to operate for 20 years.

Sandia National Laboratory (SNL)

Sandia is the location of the Z-pulse power facility which conducts x-ray pulse experiments to validate performance of nuclear warhead components. The facility saw an "extraordinary increase" in performance in 1997 and in 1998 the Z machine will perform about 200 x-ray shots in support of nuclear weapons maintenance. The DOE is currently considering a proposal to fund construction of an advanced accelerator at SNL capable of producing high-yield fusion. If funded, the X-1 would achieve initial operating capability in 2007 and produce high-yield fusion by about 2010.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)

Under construction at LLNL is the National Ignition Facility (NIF), the world’s largest laser. NIF is among the most important experimental facilities to test the advanced computational capabilities needed to check the performance of nuclear weapons. When completed, NIF will able come near to simulating the pressure, temperature, and density that occurs during the detonation of a nuclear weapons. NIF will be used to examine boosting of warhead primaries. For the first time, it will also be possible in the laboratory to study radiation physics in an environment close to that which exists in a nuclear weapons secondary. NIF will also be used to study weapons effects and for improving and validating new physics models and computer codes for nuclear warheads developed by the Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative (see below). Construction of NIF was begun in May 1997 and is scheduled to be completed in the fall of 2003. The total cost will be, at a minimum, $1.2 billion. Startup activities are scheduled to begin in FY2001, and will include experiments with the eight first lasers.

Other laser programs at LLNL include the Strategic Materials Applications Program (SMAP) which, among other applications, develops technologies for using advanced lasers to produce uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons.

LLNL is also the location of the Flash X-Ray (FXR) facility which is used to investigate the performance of nuclear weapons primaries. In 1995, for example, both the W84 and W87 warhead were subject to tests to investigate behavior near the end of the implosion face. LLNL is hydro-testing "all LLNL weapon designs using our most modern experimental capabilities and numerical models to gain up-to-date insight into their safety and performance". A three-year upgrade of FXR was completed in 1995, another upgrade was begun in October that year, and in 1996 work was begun to convert the facility to a Contained Firing Facility. This facility is the most versatile and complete test firing facility in the world.

Nevada Test Site (NTS) and Subcritical Nuclear Tests

Established in 1950 as the Atomic Energy Commission's on-continent proving ground, the Nevada Test Site has been the site of over 900 atmospheric and underground nuclear tests. Since the nuclear weapons testing moratorium in 1992 and under the direction of the Department of Energy (DOE), other nuclear-related work has expanded.

The Department of Energy, as part of its Stockpile Stewardship and Management Program, is conducting "subcritical" explosions involving small amounts of plutonium at NTS each year. These experiments are carried out in the U1a Experimental Facility almost 1000 feet below the surface. They provide information about the behavior of nuclear materials during the implosion phase of a nuclear warhead.


U1a Facility:
Location of Subcriticals

Although the amount and configuration of plutonium used in the experiments is designed so that no nuclear explosion will take place, the objective is the same as with full-scale nuclear test explosions: to obtain data about the performance of nuclear warheads. The data obtained is used to further develop computer simulation capabilities and to certify the performance of nuclear weapons in the operational stockpile.

Two subcritical experiments were conducted at the NTS in 1997, "Rebound" on 2 July, and "Holog" on 18 September. On 25 March 1998, "Stagecoach" was conducted, followed by "Bagpipe" on 26 September and "Cimarron" on 9 December. In 1999, "Clarinet" was conducted on 9 February. Two to four more subcritical explosions are planned to be conducted at the NTS in FY1999. The United States maintains that these tests do not violate the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). The US has signed but not yet ratified the CTBT. Other countries have protested these tests.

A plan to upgrade the U1a facility to future needs will be completed in 1998. In addition to these experiments, the overall NTS is maintained at a 2-3 year readiness to resume nuclear testing in the future if necessary.

NTS is also the location of the Big Explosives Experimental Facility (BEEF), designed to contain the detonation of conventional explosives. The facility is used to carry out hydrodynamic experiments to test the implosion process in a nuclear warhead.

Tritium Production Facility

In 1998, the DOE will decide whether to use a civilian nuclear power plant or an accelerator to produce tritium for the nuclear warheads. Fuel rods are currently being irradiated in the reactor core of the TVA power plant in Tennessee to test the feasibility of producing nuclear bomb fuel in a civilian reactor. If the decision is made to use a civilian reactor as the primary tritium production facility, production is scheduled to begin in FY2003, the same year the START II treaty is intended to enter into force. Actual extraction of the tritium would begin by FY2005.

Accelerated Strategic Computing System (ASCI)

In the wake of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the United States has begun an extensive multi-million dollar effort to replace live nuclear weapons test explosions with high-performance computer simulation. Commonly referred to as the Accelerated Strategic Computing System, the three nuclear weapons labs and a number of private industries are currently building up a capability not only to test the reliability and safety of nuclear weapons but also to explore advanced nuclear designs. The result is that less than 10 years after President Clinton signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the United States will be capable of maintaining a nuclear deterrent indefinitely without nuclear testing.

Overall, at least five different projects are underway aiming at achieving computer simulations with a 100 trillion operations per second (teraflops) capability by 2004. This computer simulation capability is needed for realistic weapon system modeling (and aging) and will be used to perform sustained nuclear weapons simulations and evaluate the reliability (performance), storage, accidents, and aging factors of nuclear weapons, as well as support annual certification of the warheads in the enduring arsenal. One specific purpose is to conduct "next generation [nuclear] weapon simulations."

In February 1998, the DOE signed a $85 million contract with the IBM Corporation for building a 10 trillion-operations-per-second computer system. The computer will be built at LLNL and completed in 2000. According to a LLNL press release, the goal of ASCI’s is not only to "develop the capability to simulate nuclear weapons’ behavior to ensure their safety and reliability over the long term," but also to be able to "calculate improved weapon physics."

Pantex Plant

The Pantex Plant is used to retrofit, maintain, and repair nuclear weapons in the stockpile, fabricate chemical high explosives for nuclear weapons, disassembly of nuclear weapons being retired from the stockpile, and interim storage of plutonium components from dismantled weapons. The facility also handles uranium, plutonium, and tritium components for the nuclear weapons.

Kansas City Plant

This is the principal fabrication facility for non-nuclear components for U.S. nuclear weapons. Production includes electrical, electronic, electromechanical, plastic, and metallic components; fuzing and firing systems and composite structures; telemetry assemblies and neutron detectors for flight test assemblies; as well as test equipment capable of performing electrical and mechanical tests on non-nuclear nuclear weapon components. During FY1999, the plant will produce tritium/deuterium reservoirs for the B61 and W88 warheads and plan production of reservoirs for the W76, W78, W80, and W87 warheads.

Friday, 11 May 2018

RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS JAMMING


Here are some links on Russian Communications Jamming. Russian Jamming is not a new thing. It was put into terrifying effect on 9-11. What these articles are not talking about is how the Russians are doing the jamming. It undoubtedly involves the use of satellites for some of the attacks. 

American General Says 'Adversaries' Are Jamming AC-130 Gunships in Syria

Electronic Warfare “Disables” U.S. Aircraft In Syria
https://futurism.com/electronic-warfare-disables-aircraft-syria/

US General Alleges American Warplanes in Syria Hit by Non-Kinetic Attacks
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201804261063916034-us-jets-electronic-warfare-syria/

RUSSIA IS ATTACKING U.S. FORCES WITH ELECTRONIC WEAPONS IN SYRIA EVERY DAY, GENERAL SAYS
http://www.newsweek.com/russia-attacking-us-forces-electronic-weapons-syria-daily-general-says-900461

Gunship Crews Practice Extra Vigilance Amid Jamming in Syria
https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2018/05/04/gunship-crews-practice-extra-vigilance-amid-jamming-syria.html

General reveals that US aircraft are being 'disabled' in Syria — the 'most aggressive' electronic warfare environment on Earth
http://www.businessinsider.com/syria-electronic-warfare-us-planes-disabled-2018-4