DON'T EXPECT SPOOKS TO GIVE YOU THE TRUTH

Does Clinton deserve all the blame? It was Dick Cheney who wanted to dismantle RU. He pushed for the collapse of the Soviet Union. He wanted to erase Russia as a major player. In the 1990's the US sponsored a Chechen proxy terrorist campaign inside RU. The aim was to break the Caucasus Region away from Russia. No one talks about the murders of Prime Minister Ruslan Outisiev of Chechnya and his brother in London. They were in London looking to procure 2000 Stinger missiles and they had made a deal with the Royal Mint to print currency, passports and stamps for Chechnya. This deal never happened. The assassination occurred on or about 26 February 1993. A few days earlier Clinton had just met with  UK PM John Major. The 26th is same day that the WTC was bombed taking out the Presidential Motorcade. 

The Russians were sending a message - STAY OUT OF CHECHNYA. Of course Clinton did not heed the warning.  Long story short. US meddling in Chechnya led to the spectacular attacks of 911 - the closest the World has ever come to nuclear war. All four E4-B's were in the air. Cheney hid in the PEOC - the White House fallout shelter bunker. Wolfowitz and others also hid in their bunkers. Bush was on Air Force One. His communications were jammed most of the day. The World is lucky to have survived 911. 911 was the day that Russia avenged American aggression on their soil - declaring war on American unipolar hegemony by attacking the administrative infrastructure of America's global empire.

THE LOGISTICS OF RECRUITING, THE TIMING AND THE PRECISION FLYING THE 911 AIRLINERS

One of the problems of the official 911 narrative is - how did Bin Laden's organization recruit 19 "suicide" hijackers without it getting picked up by US surveillance? It's impossible. How many people would have to be approached before you found 19 suicide hijackers? Because like most people even "terrorists" are not eager to commit suicide. 

Bin Laden's organization would have had to interview tens of thousands of potential hijackers before they found 19 men who might commit to the plot. In 2001 Saudi Arabia had a suicide rate of 5.00 per 100,000 males. In other words one out of 20,000 males in Saudi Arabia committed suicide. The vast majority of Saudi men are content with their lives. 

People also have loose lips. The candidates who said no to the plot would have told other people about it. Where are the men who said no to this plot? Why have they never been interviewed by television or print media? 

The reason why the plot was not picked up is -- there were no human pilots. There was no plot involving human hijackers to be picked up by US surveillance. The planes were electronically hijacked, plucked out the air mid-flight. Electronic hijacking also solves the problem of the tight timing of hijackings. Four planes were hijacked in the less than an hour and crashed into significant American landmarks. The level of precision to conduct the attack on the Navy Operations Center and Defense Intelligence Agency offices at the Pentagon required electronic hijacking as well. We go over why it was impossible here. 

https://thearea51blog.blogspot.com/2022/05/the-impossibility-of-flight-77s.html

Electronic Hijacking also explains why Norman Mineta ordered all planes to land. Because any plane could have been the next plane to be hijacked and used as a cruise missile. 

1. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/SAU/saudi-arabia/suicide-rate#:~:text=Saudi%20Arabia%20suicide%20rate%20for,a%200%25%20increase%20from%202015.

Electronic warfare 'Russian Woodpecker'

 From The Miami Herald, 7 July 1982

Radio hams do battle with 'Russian Woodpecker'

By Dave Finley

Herald Staff Writer

Electronic warfare is usually associated with a shooting war. But not always.

From their own homes, many ham radio operators have quietly carried on an electronic war with the Soviet Union for the last six years and, in some cases, are winning. Their battle is with a powerful Soviet radar signal dubbed the "Russian Woodpecker."

The Soviets fired the first shot in 1976. Miami Springs amateur operator Andy Clark (W4IYT, now SK) remembers it.

Clark was operating a commercial aeronautical communications station, one which keeps contact with long-distance airliner flights by shortwave radio. Suddenly, powerful interference came on the air, disrupting communications.

"I named that damn thing the woodpecker," Clark said, when he asked the New York headquarters of his communications firm if they, too, were experiencing "this woodpecker noise." They were.

The signal, he said, was "raising hell with the airplanes. We just couldn't contact some of them."

The "woodpecker," as it is now almost universally known because of its unmistakable sound, still disrupts shortwave communications. Its signals have long since been traced to locations within the Soviet Union.

It is, experts agree, a Soviet over-the-horizon radar system. Radio waves in what is called the shortwave range, which are actually longer than those in the VHF or microwave range, are, unlike the others, "bounced" off upper regions of the Earth's atmosphere and returned to the ground. This is how you receive faraway foreign stations on your shortwave radio.

The "skip" also is used to get a radar signal over the horizon and back to detect incoming airplanes.

The Soviets, however, have ignored internationally~accepted rules about what frequencies can be used by whom, and simply transmitted their ultra-high-powered radar signals on any frequency where "skip" conditions are good at the particular time. Their signal also is unusually "wide," blocking out a large number of other stations.

The "woodpecker" regularly interferes not only with commercial and amateur communications but with international broadcasting stations.

The hams, along with many others, complained to the U.S. government, which relayed the protests to the Soviets. Officially, the Soviets don't even admit the signal is theirs.

Some hams, irate at the intrusion into their legally-allocated frequency bands, have gone beyond simple protests.

Wayne Green, publisher of the ham magazine 73, in a recent editorial urging hams to "attack" the problem, described the process:

"If you want to screw up a radar signal, all you have to do is send a return signal on its frequency which blocks out the echos. Hams, from the earliest woodpecker days, have been driving the monster off their bands by getting on the frequency and sending properly spaced dots back. The screen somewhere in Russia blanks out and the operators utter some Russian oaths and change the frequency to get rid of the interference."

It works, too, say many hams who have tried it, although it greatly helps if several hams in different locations "gang up" on the radar's frequency. Green advocated better organization for doing just that.

Hams in Texas have tried such tactics and dubbed their group The Russian Woodpecker Hunting Club.

Robert Haviland, a Daytona Beach amateur, has heard "woodpecker hunting" on the air. There are several difficulties, he said, with transmitting on exactly the right frequency and sending the dots at exactly the right speed to interfere with the radar.

However, if it's done right, he said, "a shift in frequency of the woodpecker comes very quickly."

And an American ham operator has just won a one-on-one match with a massive Russian radar installation.

###

Copyright 1999 the Miami Herald.

Republished here with the permission of the Miami Herald.

No further republication or redistribution is permitted without the written approval of The Miami Herald.